Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:     
Arms control encompasses a range of [[international]] agreements and [[treaties]] that seek to limit the [[proliferation]] and use of various types of [[weapon]]s, including [[conventional arms]] and [[weapons of mass destruction]] (WMD). The primary goals of arms control are to prevent [[arms race]]s, enhance [[transparency]] among nations, and reduce the potential for conflict. By establishing mutual agreements, countries aim to create a more stable international environment where the likelihood of [[war]] is diminished.  
 
Arms control encompasses a range of [[international]] agreements and [[treaties]] that seek to limit the [[proliferation]] and use of various types of [[weapon]]s, including [[conventional arms]] and [[weapons of mass destruction]] (WMD). The primary goals of arms control are to prevent [[arms race]]s, enhance [[transparency]] among nations, and reduce the potential for conflict. By establishing mutual agreements, countries aim to create a more stable international environment where the likelihood of [[war]] is diminished.  
−
 
+
{{clear}}
 
==Post-Cold War American nuclear primacy fantasies==
 
==Post-Cold War American nuclear primacy fantasies==
 +
[[File:Screenshot 17-9-2026 14847.jpeg|right|300px|thumb|[[Russia]] was the only regional state to cut [[military]] spending between 2015 and 2022 after the [[US]]-backed [[Maidan coup]] in 2014.]]
 
While American [[public school]]s and [[media]] promoted the [[climate hoax]] after the [[Cold War]] as the biggest threat to the planet, in 2006 the official rag of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]] ''Foreign Policy'' published an article by Keir A. Lieber and Daryl G. Press titled, ''The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy.'' Here’s what Lieber and Press imparted on their readers:
 
While American [[public school]]s and [[media]] promoted the [[climate hoax]] after the [[Cold War]] as the biggest threat to the planet, in 2006 the official rag of the [[Council on Foreign Relations]] ''Foreign Policy'' published an article by Keir A. Lieber and Daryl G. Press titled, ''The Rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy.'' Here’s what Lieber and Press imparted on their readers:
 
{{quotebox|During the Cold War, many [[scholar]]s and [[policy]] analysts believed that [[MAD]] made the world relatively stable and [[peace]]ful because it induced great caution in [[international politics]], discouraged the use of nuclear threats to resolve disputes, and generally restrained the [[superpower]]s' [[behavior]]. … This debate may now seem like ancient history…
 
{{quotebox|During the Cold War, many [[scholar]]s and [[policy]] analysts believed that [[MAD]] made the world relatively stable and [[peace]]ful because it induced great caution in [[international politics]], discouraged the use of nuclear threats to resolve disputes, and generally restrained the [[superpower]]s' [[behavior]]. … This debate may now seem like ancient history…
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
294,287

edits

Navigation menu