Changes

|1974

|1974

|NC-17

|NC-17

|This atrocious movie is made from the same director of ''Pink Flamingos'', starring an overweight delinquent student named Dawn Davenport (played by transvestite Divine) who abandons her family and starts a life of crime. Crime is glorified and embraced, for Dawn decides to start causing crime as a way to get famous, and she even shows no remorse for her actions while she is electrocuted at the end of the movie, thanking her fans for helping her gain infamy. Abuse is also glorified, from Dawn's contempt for her parents to refusing to let her daughter Taffy be a normal girl, beating her harshly and even threatening to kill her for joining Hare Krishna (and eventually does). When Taffy later meets her father who abandoned the family, he sexually harasses her, pushing an incest vibe as well. The movie also pushes the homosexual agenda, where one woman urges a man to become gay because she thinks of heterosexuality as boring, and it shows two close-up shots of male genitalia as well. Like with ''Pink Flamingos'', this movie got a positive reception from a rather morality-deprived audience.

|This atrocious movie is made by the same director as ''Pink Flamingos'', starring an overweight delinquent student named Dawn Davenport (played by transvestite Divine) who abandons her family and starts a life of crime. Crime is glorified and embraced, for Dawn decides to start causing crime as a way to get famous, and she even shows no remorse for her actions while she is electrocuted at the end of the movie, thanking her fans for helping her gain infamy. Abuse is also glorified, from Dawn's contempt for her parents to refusing to let her daughter Taffy be a normal girl, beating her harshly and even threatening to kill her for joining Hare Krishna (and eventually does). When Taffy later meets her father, who abandoned the family, he sexually harasses her, pushing an incest vibe as well. The movie also pushes the homosexual agenda, where one woman urges a man to become gay because she thinks of heterosexuality as boring, and it shows two close-up shots of male genitalia as well. Like with ''Pink Flamingos'', this movie got a positive reception from a rather morality-deprived audience.

|$25,000

|$25,000

|-

|-

|2024

|2024

|R

|R

|While the 2000 ''[[Gladiator]]'' film portrayed masculinity positively, this 2024 sequel treats it as a bad joke. Lucius - son of Maximus and Lucilla - is introduced in this movie being scolded by his wife for being slightly too aggressive while plowing the fields. Said wife is treated as a more superior soldier compared to her husband, and when she gets killed in battle, Lucius is blamed for letting her fight at all. General Acacius is also shown being ashamed of winning a battle in the Colosseum, which shows that the movie is mocking strength and victory as "problematic".

|While the 2000 ''[[Gladiator]]'' film portrayed masculinity positively, this 2024 sequel treats it as a bad joke. Lucius - son of Maximus and Lucilla - is introduced in this movie being scolded by his wife for being slightly too aggressive while plowing the fields. His wife is treated as a more superior soldier compared to her husband, and when she gets killed in battle, Lucius is blamed for letting her fight at all. General Acacius is also shown ashamed of winning a battle in the Colosseum, which suggests the movie mocks strength and victory as "problematic."

|$34 million

|$34 million

|-  

|-  

|2007

|2007

|PG

|PG

|Poor [[moral]]s shown, encourages homosexual agenda, bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives as segregationists and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint.  

|Poor [[moral]]s shown; encourages a homosexual agenda; bad behavior, such as smoking, drinking, and cursing. Many sexual comments are shown. It portrays conservatives as segregationists and those with high expectations in a negative viewpoint.  

|$118,871,849

|$118,871,849

|-

|-

|2021

|2021

|R

|R

|A pornographic French movie that exists solely to celebrate abortion.  It also wants you to believe that should abortion become illegal, the crime rate will go up.

|A pornographic French movie that exists solely to celebrate abortion.  It also wants you to believe that if abortion becomes illegal, the crime rate will go up.

|$1,600,000

|$1,600,000

|-

|-

|2022

|2022

|PG

|PG

|This sequel to the great conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It of course stars leftist actress Bette Middler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the "patriarchy". In spite of the Sanderson Sisters clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]].

|This sequel to the great conservative 1993 film ''Hocus Pocus'' takes place 29 years after the original movie. It, of course, stars leftist actress Bette Midler (who also played Winifred from the first movie), and it features rants against the "patriarchy". In spite of the Sanderson Sisters being clearly meant to be evil child-murderers unrepentant of their crime, the movie tries to make them redeemable, thus showing [[moral relativism]].

|N/A

|N/A

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG-13

|PG-13

|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the face of Indiana Jones, putting him down in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects are totally unrelated.

|This final entry in the ''Indiana Jones'' movie series is also a major slap in the face of Indiana Jones, putting him down in favor of his goddaughter. Said goddaughter also justifies stealing an artifact that Indiana has taken by claiming "It's called capitalism". When Indiana mentions bravely fighting the Nazis, she disrespectfully attacks him for "occupying stolen land" from Native Americans, despite the two subjects being unrelated.

|$

|$

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Unfortunately, Christian movie star, Chris Pratt, cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. This film, like its predecessor, "Jurassic World," is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger and clearly conveying an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, with her character acting as such. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a "nasty woman," which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html</ref>

|Unfortunately, Christian movie star Chris Pratt cannot save this film from being a liberal disaster. Like its predecessor, "Jurassic World," this film is also very supportive of feminism. In fact, that is even more apparent, as Chris Pratt's character - Owen Grady - is depicted as heartless for not wanting to save the dinosaurs and preferring to be left alone; on the flip side, the more feminist Claire Dearing is now a dinosaur rights activist, using Owen's ''Velociraptor'' Blue to get Owen to save the dinosaurs with her. At the end of the film, the dinosaurs are released into the wild, putting billions of human lives in danger and clearly conveying an environmental message. Also, one of the younger characters clearly looks like an SJW, and her character acts like one. Not only that, but one of the main antagonists calls her a "nasty woman," which is clearly a jab at Donald Trump. According to one of the actresses, Daniella Pineda, there was intended to be a scene (that was fortunately cut) that revealed that her character, Zia Rodriguez, was a lesbian when admitting she was fond of Chris Pratt's character.<ref>https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/jurassic-world-fallen-kingdom-star-daniella-pinedas-lesbian-reveal-cut-film-183618705.html</ref>

|$417,719,760

|$417,719,760

|-

|-

|2003

|2003

|PG (should be PG-13)

|PG (should be PG-13)

|Don’t let the trailers, posters and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He only appears in 7 minutes of the whole film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but it was retooled because the test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero played by Jerry O’Connell grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.

|Don’t let the trailers, posters, and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He appears in only 7 minutes of the film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but they retooled it because test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero, played by Jerry O’Connell, grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family-friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.

|$88,929,111

|$88,929,111

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case in point, with Disney changing Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times" as described by the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments done by the side characters given to Ariel for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots, or evil with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers judging all of his daughters are of different races, at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby's attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].

|Race-swapped live-action version of the 1989 animated counterpart and classic of the same name. Case in point: Disney changed Howard Ashman's original lyrics to suit more "modern times," as described by the "woke" social media minority in the English-speaking West, as well as many of the accomplishments given to Ariel by the side characters for female empowerment. Many of the men were portrayed as either useless idiots or evil, with Prince Eric (who is now adopted) not being the one who killed Ursula, and that King Triton probably had multiple wives or lovers, judging by all of his daughters being of different races; at least this would be a rational explanation because it would be absurd even for a Disney movie to imagine having multiple daughters of different races with only a wife or lover. One of the background mermen is even cast by a pornstar, further questioning Disney's already-questionable casting choices. Also, Grimsby's attitude towards Eric being with Ariel is more [[Pragmatism|pragmatic]] rather than [[Idealism|idealistic]].

It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another piece of evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with also videos showing the evidence of that, leading to assume that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and misleading the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.

It was a major flop at the box office that failed even to break even, and liberals blamed racism due to Ariel now being black despite the original story being Danish, another piece of evidence of liberal and woke hypocrisy and anti-European and anti-redhead racism and bigotry. Cinema workers and [[YouTube]]/[[Tik Tok]] creators denounced a lack of spectators in the theaters for the film, with videos also showing evidence of that, leading to the assumption that Disney or corporate bots on social media tried to illegally inflate the box office in order to promote the film and mislead the public, like it happened with the ''Captain Marvel'' movie.

|$250 million

|$250 million

|-

|-

|2014

|2014

|PG

|PG

|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]], and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film stating how it promoted the leftist agenda and citing point by point its agenda.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown not to care for Aurora at all and was willing to let her die from the curse.

|Apparently represents the idea of revising the ''Sleeping Beauty'' story to focus on a lesbian relationship; although Aurora clearly loves Maleficent as a mother figure, Maleficent takes over the role of the prince and is revealed to be the person whose kiss of "true love" (given on the forehead) really saved Aurora. Revisionist piece which unabashedly promotes the feminist agenda to the extent that most of the males are either villains or useless, even going so far as to heavily hint at a transgender philosophy; promotes hard-core environmentalism, [[moral relativism]], and even Marxism; pretty much ruins the morality tale for ''Sleeping Beauty''. ''The Federalist'' also had a field day with the film, arguing that it promoted a leftist agenda and citing its points one by one.<ref>https://thefederalist.com/2014/06/06/maleficent-once-upon-a-screed/</ref> In particular, King Stefan, far from being depicted as a good father who gave up Aurora to the three fairies to protect her from the curse, was shown as not caring for Aurora at all and willing to let her die from the curse.

|$241,410,378

|$241,410,378

|-

|-

|2013

|2013

|R

|R

|Anthology of short "comedy" films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the "humor" is scatological, including a scene with a character who enjoys being defecated upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).

|Anthology of short "comedy" films which glamorize virtually every form of deviant sexuality imaginable. Much of the "humor" is scatological, including a scene in which a character enjoys being defecated upon. Aside from that, ''Movie 43'' is literally one of the worst motion pictures ever made in history, as it has nothing that would make it good, imaginative, funny, charming, or understandable of its existence at all. Won three Razzie awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director (all directors) and Worst Screenplay (all screenwriters).

|$32.4 million

|$32.4 million

|-

|-

|1994

|1994

|R

|R

|Riddled with violence, drug abuse and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as "heroes". Infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold for committing the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]<ref>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/</ref>   

|Riddled with violence, drug abuse, and sexual references, this movie's main characters are brutal serial killers who are viewed as "heroes". It is infamously known for influencing Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold to commit the massacre at [[Columbine High School massacre]]<ref>https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-columbine-shooters/</ref>   

|$50,282,766

|$50,282,766

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG18

|PG18

|The movie starred and produced by feminist and liberal Jennifer Lawrence. The movie showed a parents ruined life over their son to be with promiscuous woman. Despite the huge budget but the movie didnt get success.

|The movie starred and was produced by feminist and liberal Jennifer Lawrence. The movie showed a parent's ruined life over their son being with a promiscuous woman. Despite the huge budget, the movie didn't get success.

|$45 million

|$45 million

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. Strong [[feminism]], with Wendy not having any maternal instincts, instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded, barely even appearing in the film. There is nothing childlike about this film; it was not vibrantly colorful, like the original film. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.

|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. It features strong [[feminism]], with Wendy having no maternal instincts and instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded and barely appear in the film. Nothing about this film feels childlike; it isn't vibrantly colorful like the original. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.

|N/A

|N/A

|-

|-

|2021

|2021

|R

|R

|Scene after scene of pro-[[homosexuality]] allusions, under the guise of being a Western when there is really no Western content in the movie.  “Where’s the Western in this Western?” asked acclaimed actor Sam Elliott.  "There’s all these allusions of homosexuality throughout the movie," he added.   

|Scene after scene of pro-[[homosexuality]] allusions, under the guise of being a Western, when there is really no Western content in the movie.  “Where’s the Western in this Western?” asked acclaimed actor Sam Elliott.  "There’s all these allusions of homosexuality throughout the movie," he added.   

|Netflix

|Netflix

|-

|-

|2020

|2020

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backward" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unemphatic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive, while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town is seen as in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.

|Based on a 2018 Broadway show, the movie stars a bunch of celebrities from cities like Los Angeles arriving at a rural Indiana town, looking down on the locals for their "backward" ways. The movie is definitely pro-homosexuality, for the main character is seen as right in wanting to attend a dance with a female date, while the townsfolk are painted as bigoted against her because of this. Christianity is also demonized, for a group of Christians at the local mall are labeled as unempathetic because they wanted to follow the Bible and go to church. Middle America - as well as its [[small town values]] that it represents - is also mocked as being stupid and non-progressive, while the urban far-left celebrity lifestyle that the newcomers try to force onto the town is seen as being in the right; the main character even sings about how superior living in a city like San Francisco is compared to rural Indiana.

|-  

|-  

|''Quills''

|''Quills''

|2015

|2015

|R

|R

|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film itself is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and exclusion of the representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated it) and failed to make its case for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.

|Based on the 1969 Stonewall Riots, this film is a pro-homosexual film that pushes the homosexual agenda. It's rather ironic to note that the film itself is a victim of historical revisionism, offensive racial stereotypes, and the exclusion of minority representation of minorities. While the filmmakers tried to defend their artistic decisions, the film was overwhelmingly criticized by critics and audiences (even liberals, not surprisingly, hated it) and failed to make its case for awards consideration during the 2015 Oscar season.

|$187,674

|$187,674

|-

|-

|2015

|2015

|R

|R

|Sequel to the film, which is equally as raunchy and vulgar. This film did not even make half as much as the original.

|A sequel to the 2012 film ''Ted'', this film is equally raunchy and vulgar. It did not even make half as much as the original.

|$81,476,385

|$81,476,385

|-

|-