| Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| | | | |
| | --> | | --> |
| − | The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note">''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World." See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood: | + | The [[theory of relativity]] is disproved by numerous counterexamples, but is promoted by [[liberals]], who like its encouragement of [[moral relativism|relativism]] and its tendency to pull people away from the [[Bible]].<ref group="note"> ''See, e.g.'', historian Paul Johnson's book, ''Modern Times: The World from the Twenties to the Nineties'' (Harpercollins, 1983), 1st U.S. ed., ch. 1: "A Relativistic World." See also Tribe, Laurence H. (November 1989). "The curvature of constitutional space: what lawyers can learn from modern physics." ''Harvard Law Review'' (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), vol. 103, no. 1 (thanking [[Barack Obama]], who was a first-year law student when this absurd law review article was written, for his supposed "analytic and research assistance").</ref> Here is a list of 52 counterexamples: any one of them would prove that relativity is a [[politically correct]] falsehood: |
| | #The '''''acceleration''''' in the expansion of the [[universe]] disproves relativity, and never-seen "[[dark energy]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory; data released in April 2019 shows that the universe is expanding more rapidly than the theory allows.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/65332-hubble-wrong-speed.html</ref> | | #The '''''acceleration''''' in the expansion of the [[universe]] disproves relativity, and never-seen "[[dark energy]]" has been invented to try to retrofit observations to the theory; data released in April 2019 shows that the universe is expanding more rapidly than the theory allows.<ref>https://www.livescience.com/65332-hubble-wrong-speed.html</ref> |
| | #If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models."<ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref> | | #If space were curved as the [[theory of relativity]] asserts, one would never expect the universe as a whole to be virtually '''''precisely flat''''', but it is. "Somewhat surprisingly, current observational data favours the delicately balanced flat over both the open and closed models."<ref>https://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/f/Friedmann-Lemaitre+Universe</ref> |
| Line 41: |
Line 41: |
| | #The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref> | | #The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref> |
| | #The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html ("A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, and would undermine much of traditional physics. But some physicists believe it would elegantly explain puzzling cosmological phenomena such as the nearly uniform temperature of the universe.")</ref> | | #The uniformity in temperature throughout the universe.<ref>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6092-speed-of-light-may-have-changed-recently.html ("A varying speed of light contradicts Einstein's theory of relativity, and would undermine much of traditional physics. But some physicists believe it would elegantly explain puzzling cosmological phenomena such as the nearly uniform temperature of the universe.")</ref> |
| − | #"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous", but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.<ref>[https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].</ref> | + | #"According to Einstein’s view on the universe, space-time should be smooth and continuous," but observations instead show "inexplicable static" greater than "all artificial sources of" possible background noise.<ref>[https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/Cool-Astronomy/2010/1025/Is-the-universe-a-big-hologram-This-device-could-find-out. Hunt for gravitational waves discovers unexpected data instead].</ref> |
| | #"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space</ref> | | #"The snag is that in quantum mechanics, time retains its Newtonian aloofness, providing the stage against which matter dances but never being affected by its presence. These two [QM and relativity] conceptions of time don’t gel."<ref>http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=splitting-time-from-space</ref> |
| | #The theory predicts [[wormholes]] just as it predicts [[black holes]], but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.<ref>http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i13/p1446_1 . The popular science press promotes black holes to a far greater extent than wormholes.</ref> | | #The theory predicts [[wormholes]] just as it predicts [[black holes]], but wormholes violate causality and permit absurd time travel.<ref>http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v61/i13/p1446_1 . The popular science press promotes black holes to a far greater extent than wormholes.</ref> |