Changes

|1972

|1972

|PG

|PG

|This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason<ref>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv</ref>.

|This "comedy" fails to be a political satire as it fails to lampoon both sides of the coin and supports [[George McGovern]] at every turn. It was released during the 1972 election year as a smear campaign against [[Richard Nixon]] and his conservative colleagues. Conservative star [[James Stewart]] refused to star in it for that reason.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068334/trivia?ref_=tt_trv_trv</ref>

|  

|  

|-

|-

|2000

|2000

|R

|R

|This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans<ref>http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman</ref>.

|This film about the 2000 presidential election is little more than a pro-[[Al Gore]] propaganda piece by liberal studio executives and [[Hollywood values]]. Conservative star Gary Oldman also told IGN that the film was supposed to be apolitical, but it was edited to vilify Republicans.<ref>http://www.ign.com/articles/2001/02/26/interview-with-gary-oldman</ref>

|$17,872,723

|$17,872,723

|-

|-

|2020

|2020

|R

|R

|Based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is "satire" and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an "alleged" portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term "alleged" inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink.  The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: "They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others"] at Breitbart News Network</ref> while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily-influenced leftists to commit violence.<ref>[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax</ref>  The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel</ref> It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/</ref>.

|Based in part on the 1924 short story ''The Most Dangerous Game'' but given a modern political twist, focusing on conservatives from different walks of life being rounded up and hunted for sport by rich elitist liberals. Wikipedia claims in its article about the movie that it is "satire" and, in the article, stated that the movie drew criticism from members of the conservative media as an "alleged" portrayal of liberals hunting supporters of Donald Trump (with the term "alleged" inserted in the article in an attempt to brush off and dismiss said criticism), but it is simply Hollywood elites engaging in thinking out loud about what they wish to do to those who don't agree with or support their leftist political/social groupthink.  The movie drew high-profile criticism from none other than President Trump, who used it to criticize Hollywood for its racism, hatred and promotion of violence in the media, which it then uses inflammatorily to blame others and create chaos,<ref>[https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/08/09/donald-trump-thunders-against-racist-hollywood-they-create-violence-then-try-to-blame-others/ Donald Trump Thunders Against Racist Hollywood: "They Create Violence, Then Try to Blame Others"] at Breitbart News Network</ref> while conservative author [[David Horowitz]] called for the movie not to be released, stating that it may serve only to incite easily influenced leftists to commit violence.<ref>[https://www.newsmax.com/newsmax-tv/david-horowitz-racism-the-hunt-liberal/2019/08/08/id/927939/ David Horowitz to Newsmax TV: Left Seeks to 'Exterminate'] at Newsmax</ref>  The movie was subsequently withdrawn from release by distributor Universal Pictures in the wake of the recent mass shootings in [[El Paso Walmart shooting|El Paso]] and [[Dayton nightclub shooting|Dayton]].<ref>[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcJGfYiUDDE Universal Studios pulls the movie ''The Hunt''] at Fox News YouTube channel</ref> It was eventually recut, with the trailers making clear that the rich elitist liberals are intended to be the villains.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2020/02/the-hunt-returns-with-a-trailer-making-it-known-liberal-elites-are-the-bad-guys/102988/</ref>

|$5,812,500

|$5,812,500

|-

|-

|2017

|2017

|R

|R

|History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justified<ref>https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001</ref><ref>https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html</ref>. There's also an anti-family theme, as Harding's mother is falsely portrayed as psychologically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life<ref>https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/</ref>.

|History revisionist film that paints criminal Tonya Harding as a victim, reframing the narrative around her implication in the crime of attacking Nancy Kerrigan as justified.<ref>https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/971183001</ref><ref>https://www.oregonlive.com/trending/2018/01/i_nauseated_the_oregonians_for.html</ref> There's also an anti-family theme, as Harding's mother is falsely portrayed as psychologically abusive, despite the fact that she was nothing like that in real life.<ref>https://people.com/movies/tonya-harding-mother-monster-friend/</ref>

|$53 million  

|$53 million  

|-

|-

|1997

|1997

|R

|R

|The second film to be based on Vladimir Nabokov's infamous novel, the first being by Stanley Kubrick. However, in contrast to the very tame Kubrick version (limited only by the censorship of it's day), this version indulges with the gratuitous sexuality that made the book so controversial. The story portrays the relationship of Lolita and Humbert as a beautiful romance. Also, as implied by the tagline of the film's poster, the main message is that "Age is Just a Number".

|The second film to be based on Vladimir Nabokov's infamous novel, the first being by Stanley Kubrick. However, in contrast to the very tame Kubrick version (limited only by the censorship of its day), this version indulges with the gratuitous sexuality that made the book so controversial. The story portrays the relationship of Lolita and Humbert as a beautiful romance. Also, as implied by the tagline of the film's poster, the main message is that "Age is Just a Number".

|$1.1 million

|$1.1 million

|-

|-

|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions''); 2021 (''The Matrix Resurrections'')

|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions''); 2021 (''The Matrix Resurrections'')

|R

|R

|A hacker discovers his world is a replica of the world as it was before a cataclysmic future event in which intelligent machines took over humanity, so he joins a resistance to end the machines' reign. Despite this salvation narrative, the whole trilogy glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s "On Nihilism" chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), hinting several times towards a pro-Communist, anti-American (with one scene in the first film, when Thomas Anderson meets Agent Smith, having Anderson's dossier listing Anderson as hailing from "FU, USA" which not-so-subtly is meant to say "[Censored] You, USA"), [[anti-Christian]] view. The second film's Architect scene tries to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths, with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. In this same scene, a panel of screens implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world, and it features wars and conflicts specifically involving America. In fact, far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. The first film's throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher is a shallow attempt at insulting [[Ronald Reagan]] because Smith implies that Cipher will become the next Ronald Reagan should he succeed in betraying his allies to the agents. The trilogy's overall depiction of religion is closer to Gnosticism, even with Neo, the main protagonist, presented as a savior-figure. The Wachowskis openly admitted in an interview that they deliberately modeled the entire story after Friedrich Nietzche's writings.<ref>http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/</ref><ref>Peter Bart, “Cracking the Wachowski’s Code,” Variety.com, May 25, 2003.</ref> The trilogy has been cited as the cause for various murders, ultimately leading to a variant of the [[insanity defense]] known as the Matrix Defense<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/21/ctv.matrix.insanity/</ref>, and it shares similar themes to the [[Worst Liberal Video Games|Worst Liberal Video Game]] ''Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty'' because Hideo Kojima confessed that he intended to use the same themes for the game.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20130328062143/http://www.gamespot.com/news/hideo-kojima-speaks-about-the-matrix-2448486</ref> A fourth movie was announced to be in the works.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/08/the-wachowskis-announce-the-matrix-4-is-in-the-works/91350/</ref> The movies overall had several hints at a Marxist (and even Maoist) outlook,<ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1408419/posts?page=1</ref> which was later confirmed by Larry Wachowski, or rather, Lilly Wachowski, who stated that "she" created the trilogy "out of a lot of anger and a lot of rage, and it's rage at capitalism and corporatized structure and forms of oppression.", as well as overall as an extension of "her" angst at the "oppression" of [[Gender confusion|being born male instead of female]].<ref>https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lilly-wachowski-shares-how-matrix-franchise-was-inspired-by-rage-oppression-before-transition-1296914</ref>. Unlike the previous entries, the latest entry, ''The Matrix Resurrections'', doesn't bother to hide the fact that it is pro-[[transgenderism]] and shows a level of outward contempt for [[family values]] that is unprecedented in Hollywood - as the character of Trinity only finds her life to be fulfilling when she abandons her husband and children to lead a Marxist revolution against conservatives.  The villain of this entry is based on Conservative commentator [[Ben Shapiro]] and wrongly portrays his common sense views on trans people as Nazism.

|A hacker discovers his world is a replica of the world as it was before a cataclysmic future event in which intelligent machines took over humanity, so he joins a resistance to end the machines' reign. Despite this salvation narrative, the whole trilogy glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s "On Nihilism" chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), hinting several times towards a pro-Communist, anti-American (with one scene in the first film, when Thomas Anderson meets Agent Smith, having Anderson's dossier listing Anderson as hailing from "FU, USA" which not-so-subtly is meant to say "[Censored] You, USA"), [[anti-Christian]] view. The second film's Architect scene tries to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths, with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. In this same scene, a panel of screens implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world, and it features wars and conflicts specifically involving America. In fact, far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. The first film's throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher is a shallow attempt at insulting [[Ronald Reagan]] because Smith implies that Cipher will become the next Ronald Reagan should he succeed in betraying his allies to the agents. The trilogy's overall depiction of religion is closer to Gnosticism, even with Neo, the main protagonist, presented as a savior-figure. The Wachowskis openly admitted in an interview that they deliberately modeled the entire story after Friedrich Nietzche's writings.<ref>http://www.equip.org/article/the-matrix-unloaded-revelations/</ref><ref>Peter Bart, “Cracking the Wachowski’s Code,” Variety.com, May 25, 2003.</ref> The trilogy has been cited as the cause for various murders, ultimately leading to a variant of the [[insanity defense]] known as the Matrix Defense,<ref>https://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/05/21/ctv.matrix.insanity/</ref> and it shares similar themes to the [[Worst Liberal Video Games|Worst Liberal Video Game]] ''Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty'' because Hideo Kojima confessed that he intended to use the same themes for the game.<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20130328062143/http://www.gamespot.com/news/hideo-kojima-speaks-about-the-matrix-2448486</ref> A fourth movie was announced to be in the works.<ref>https://www.oneangrygamer.net/2019/08/the-wachowskis-announce-the-matrix-4-is-in-the-works/91350/</ref> The movies overall had several hints at a Marxist (and even Maoist) outlook,<ref>http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1408419/posts?page=1</ref> which was later confirmed by Larry Wachowski, or rather, Lilly Wachowski, who stated that "she" created the trilogy "out of a lot of anger and a lot of rage, and it's rage at capitalism and corporatized structure and forms of oppression.", as well as overall as an extension of "her" angst at the "oppression" of [[Gender confusion|being born male instead of female]].<ref>https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/lilly-wachowski-shares-how-matrix-franchise-was-inspired-by-rage-oppression-before-transition-1296914</ref> Unlike the previous entries, the latest entry, ''The Matrix Resurrections'', doesn't bother to hide the fact that it is pro-[[transgenderism]] and shows a level of outward contempt for [[family values]] that is unprecedented in Hollywood - as the character of Trinity only finds her life to be fulfilling when she abandons her husband and children to lead a Marxist revolution against conservatives.  The villain of this entry is based on Conservative commentator [[Ben Shapiro]] and wrongly portrays his common sense views on trans people as Nazism.

| $592,370,339 (all together)  

| $592,370,339 (all together)  

|-

|-

|2014

|2014

|R

|R

|A movie normalizes abortion after casual sex with humorous style. The movie didnt get success they expect  

|A movie normalizes abortion after casual sex with humorous style. The movie didn't get success they expect  

|$1 million

|$1 million

|-

|-

|2007

|2007

|R

|R

|Brian De Palma’s 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].

|Brian De Palma's 2007 fictional anti-Iraq War film funded by Mark Cuban. The film is credited with inspiring a [[terrorist]] attack that killed two U.S. servicemen in [[Germany]].

|$65,388

|$65,388

|-

|-

|2020

|2020

|PG-18

|PG-18

|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that was produced by the woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English paleontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799-1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788-1869) as women who had a lesbian affair with many sexually explicit scenes, which has no historical evidence to prove that. Despite the objections of the Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated for many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster for producers, gaining only gaining $1.4 million with a budget of $13.4 million.

|Is a history revisionist and immoral movie that was produced by the woke [[BBC]] and starred by woke actresses Kate Winslet and Saoirse Ronan. The movie portrayed the English paleontologist and fossil collector Marie Anning (1799–1847) and English geologist Charlotte Murchison (1788–1869) as women who had a lesbian affair with many sexually explicit scenes, which has no historical evidence to prove that. Despite the objections of the Anning family, producers continued with their distortion. Although the movie was nominated for many awards by woke liberal critics, it was a huge disaster for producers, gaining only gaining $1.4 million with a budget of $13.4 million.

|$13.4 million

|$13.4 million

|-

|-

|2024

|2024

|

|

| A sexually explicit porn movie filled with anti-Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at the box office and didn't gain over 40$ million, but despite that, it was awarded the Academy Award for Best Picture.

| A sexually explicit porn movie filled with anti-Russian propaganda. The film failed miserably at the box office and didn't gain over $40 million, but despite that, it was awarded the Academy Award for Best Picture.

|$6 million

|$6 million

|-

|-

|2022

|2022

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Liberal atheist James Cameron's sequel to his highly overrated movie.  This is yet another nonsensical screed against [[capitalism]] that pushes [[political correctness]], [[woke|wokeism]], [[environmentalism]], and [[feminism]]. Once again, he celebrates eco-terrorism and treats [[paganism]] as truth. He also portrays the US government as savage terrorists who remorselessly torture children. Cameron also publicly promoted this sequel by sharing overtly disgusting and disrespectful views on pregnant women and describing [[testosterone]] as a "poison" or "toxin" that needs to be eradicated.

|Liberal atheist James Cameron's sequel to his highly overrated movie.  This is yet another nonsensical screed against [[capitalism]] that pushes [[political correctness]], [[woke]]ism, [[environmentalism]], and [[feminism]]. Once again, he celebrates eco-terrorism and treats [[paganism]] as truth. He also portrays the US government as savage terrorists who remorselessly torture children. Cameron also publicly promoted this sequel by sharing overtly disgusting and disrespectful views on pregnant women and describing [[testosterone]] as a "poison" or "toxin" that needs to be eradicated.

|-

|-

|''Babygirl''

|''Babygirl''

|2016

|2016

|R

|R

|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father’s security company) to steal items to sell. The "villain" of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find that he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also, feminism is present with the leader of the thieves being a girl.

|The movie's protagonists are three burglars who break into homes (secured by one of their father's security company) to steal items to sell. The "villain" of the movie is a blind army veteran, and the homeowner of the house they are breaking into. Although they do find that he has kidnapped the girl who killed his daughter in a car accident. Also, feminism is present with the leader of the thieves being a girl.

|$89,217,875

|$89,217,875

|-

|-

|NR

|NR

|This movie was directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received a low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expected.

|This movie was directed and produced by feminist and misandrist Olivia Wilde. The movie demonizes patriarchy and especially white men. The movie received a low approval rating from even from notoriously biased [[Rotten Tomatoes]] and didn't receive earnings as producers expected.

|35$ Million

|$35 Million

|-

|-

|''Doom''

|''Doom''

|2005

|2005

|R

|R

|Based on the video game that influenced the [[Columbine High School massacre|Columbine High School massacre]]<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html</ref>, ll the military characters (except one) are corrupt. Fans of the game criticized it for not including much monster-themed action.

|Based on the video game that influenced the [[Columbine High School massacre]],<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20060223025846/columbine.free2host.net/quotes.html</ref> ll the military characters (except one) are corrupt. Fans of the game criticized it for not including much monster-themed action.

|$28,212,337

|$28,212,337

|-

|-

|2024

|2024

|

|

|It's a musical film about a [[Mexican drug cartel]] member who becomes trans that includes a creepy musical number about sex change surgery. Despite failing miserably in box office, The movie was nominated for 13 awards by liberal Academy awards. The movie budget was $26 million and got only $15.4 million on box office, around 12$ million deficit.

|It's a musical film about a [[Mexican drug cartel]] member who becomes trans that includes a creepy musical number about sex change surgery. Despite failing miserably in box office, The movie was nominated for 13 awards by liberal Academy awards. The movie budget was $26 million and got only $15.4 million on box office, around $12 million deficit.

|$26 million

|$26 million

|-

|-

|2006

|2006

|R

|R

|Despite Bruce Willis is in it, and the title the film attacks [[capitalism]] and [[Fast food|fast food]] in general while pushing [[environmentalism]], veganism, [[illegal immigration]], and extramarital sex.

|Despite Bruce Willis is in it, and the title the film attacks [[capitalism]] and [[fast food]] in general while pushing [[environmentalism]], veganism, [[illegal immigration]], and extramarital sex.

|$1,005,539

|$1,005,539

|-  

|-  

|2009

|2009

|R

|R

|This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti-feminist. Even [[Chris Pratt]], who had a minor role as a police officer, couldn’t save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda.

|This film starring [[Megan Fox]] and [[Amanda Seyfried]] promotes feminism and glorifies [[Satanism]], and contains a lesbian kiss and them making out. It was a victim of Liberal false advertising that promised audiences it would be anti-feminist. Even [[Chris Pratt]], who had a minor role as a police officer, couldn't save the film. It gained a cult following among Liberals and those who believe in the homosexual agenda.

|$16,204,793.

|$16,204,793.

|-

|-

|2003

|2003

|PG (should be PG-13)

|PG (should be PG-13)

|Don’t let the trailers, posters, and title fool you. The film isn’t about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He appears in only 7 minutes of the film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but they retooled it because test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero, played by Jerry O’Connell, grabs a woman’s breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family-friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.

|Don't let the trailers, posters, and title fool you. The film isn't about a rapping and talking kangaroo. He appears in only 7 minutes of the film, making this a big case of Liberal false advertising. Also, it was originally going to be an R-rated mob comedy called Down and Under, but they retooled it because test audiences liked the kangaroo. The main hero, played by Jerry O’Connell, grabs a woman's breasts and is the stepson of a mob leader played by Christopher Walken. Luckily, it had a more family-friendly animated sequel with more of the titular kangaroo in 2004.

|$88,929,111

|$88,929,111

|-

|-

|2024

|2024

|Not Rated

|Not Rated

|Another feminist superhero movie which ended as huge failure to producers when box office didnt cross 100$ million.

|Another feminist superhero movie which ended as huge failure to producers when box office didn't cross $100 million.

|80$ million

|$80 million

|-  

|-  

|''Mad Max: Fury Road''

|''Mad Max: Fury Road''

|1997

|1997

|NC-17

|NC-17

|This pornographic nightmare celebrates the porn industry and criticizes [[Mormon]]s, if not all the world's religiously devout. It doesn’t help that it is from the creators of [[South Park]].

|This pornographic nightmare celebrates the porn industry and criticizes [[Mormon]]s, if not all the world's religiously devout. It doesn't help that it is from the creators of [[South Park]].

|$602,302  

|$602,302  

|-

|-

|2023

|2023

|PG

|PG

|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. It features strong [[feminism]], with Wendy having no maternal instincts and instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan’s affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded and barely appear in the film. Nothing about this film feels childlike; it isn't vibrantly colorful like the original. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.

|An extremely awful and [[woke]] version of the 1953 animated film, starting with the race-swapping of Peter Pan and Tinker Bell, as well as the race- and gender-swapping of some of the Lost Boys. It features strong [[feminism]], with Wendy having no maternal instincts and instead fighting Captain Hook. Tiger Lily - who was previously portrayed as a damsel in distress - is now portrayed as a warrior. None of the girls in the movie compete with each other for Peter Pan's affections as they did in the original; in fact, Wendy even slaps Peter Pan at one point. The mermaids are completely downgraded and barely appear in the film. Nothing about this film feels childlike; it isn't vibrantly colorful like the original. Actually Great conservative film Peter Pan (2003) has more in common with the original film, despite not even being a Disney film.

|N/A

|N/A

|-

|-

|2002

|2002

|PG (Should be PG-13)

|PG (Should be PG-13)

|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor, Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar’s Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard is portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed in 2017 that an even more vulgar version of the film existed before the official movie did.

|A supposed live-action satire of the iconic Hanna-Barbera cartoon. Shaggy is heavily implied to be a stoner and is a vegetarian like his original voice actor, Casey Kassem. Velma is implied to be a lesbian, where deleted scenes make it more apparent. Daphne is now a blatant feminist, much like Sarah Michelle Gellar's Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Fred can be a bit of a womanizer. There are plenty of raunchy innuendos, skimpy clothing among college-age women, glorifying the more decadent stereotype of Spring break, and strong language (including where Fred, possessed by a demon, says the word “b****h”). Pamela Anderson makes a cameo promoting environmentalism. The National Guard is portrayed as helpless. Written by [[James Gunn]], who would later write a more conservative and family-friendly sequel released in 2004. Gunn revealed in 2017 that an even more vulgar version of the film existed before the official movie did.

|-

|-

|''Sex and the City''

|''Sex and the City''

|2009

|2009

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A promotion of liberal values including homosexuality, nihilism, and various forms of sexual deviancy such as May-December Romances, misanthropy, and promiscuity, and also implies that even those with the strongest faith in Christianity and conservative have it vanish in an instant upon setting foot in New York City.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/16/whatever-works-doesnt/</ref> Also notable as Woody Allen overtly pushing nihilism and complete selfishness as an absolute positive, in stark contrast to past films where he at least depicted some negative consequences to selfish behavior.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/03/Review--Whatever-Works/</ref>

|A promotion of liberal values including homosexuality, nihilism, and various forms of sexual deviancy such as May–December Romances, misanthropy, and promiscuity, and also implies that even those with the strongest faith in Christianity and conservative have it vanish in an instant upon setting foot in New York City.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/16/whatever-works-doesnt/</ref> Also notable as Woody Allen overtly pushing nihilism and complete selfishness as an absolute positive, in stark contrast to past films where he at least depicted some negative consequences to selfish behavior.<ref>https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2009/07/03/Review--Whatever-Works/</ref>

|$35.1 million<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=whateverworks.htm</ref>

|$35.1 million<ref>http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=main&id=whateverworks.htm</ref>

|-

|-

|NR

|NR

|The movie demonizes men with a fake story, which shows the movie's hero as a slave liberator, while she is actually an enslaver.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g</ref>

|The movie demonizes men with a fake story, which shows the movie's hero as a slave liberator, while she is actually an enslaver.<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDYNImHt73g</ref>

|50$ Million

|$50 Million

|-

|-

|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''

|''W.R.: Mystery of the Organism''

|2012

|2012

|PG

|PG

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Merida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Merida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and was created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.

|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Mérida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Mérida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and was created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.

|$540.4 million  

|$540.4 million  

|-

|-

|2011

|2011

|PG

|PG

|A 9-year-old boy named Milo defies his mother, behaves in disorderly conduct, and is somewhat [[Nihilist|nihilistic]]. Family values are poked fun at. It also has a brief scene poking fun at the great conservative leader, [[Ronald Reagan]].

|A 9-year-old boy named Milo defies his mother, behaves in disorderly conduct, and is somewhat [[nihilist]]ic. Family values are poked fun at. It also has a brief scene poking fun at the great conservative leader, [[Ronald Reagan]].

|$39 million

|$39 million

|-

|-

|1995

|1995

|G

|G

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American’s view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American's view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  

Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.

Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.

|2020

|2020

|PG

|PG

|This movie glorified much of the [[homosexual agenda]] and normalized gay relationships. Specter, a cyclops cop for the city of New Mushroomton, is a lesbian who has an unnamed "girlfriend" and has an unnamed "daughter". The movie was banned in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Iran and Saudi Arabia because of this. On January 27, 2020, two months before the film was released, a San Francisco tattoo artist named Sweet Cecily Daniher had filed a copyright lawsuit against Disney, Pixar and Onward producer Kori Rae, believing that Pixar had copied the design of her Vanicorn in violation of her rental agreement with the company, as well as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act and the California Artists Protection Act. She has sought in her suit to prohibit the distribution of the film and any infringing advertisements or merchandise. It was a huge box office failure due to the Covid 19 outbreak.

|This movie glorified much of the [[homosexual agenda]] and normalized gay relationships. Specter, a cyclops cop for the city of New Mushroomton, is a lesbian who has an unnamed "girlfriend" and has an unnamed "daughter". The movie was banned in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Iran and Saudi Arabia because of this. On January 27, 2020, two months before the film was released, a San Francisco tattoo artist named Sweet Cecily Daniher had filed a copyright lawsuit against Disney, Pixar and Onward producer Kori Rae, believing that Pixar had copied the design of her Vanicorn in violation of her rental agreement with the company, as well as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act and the California Artists Protection Act. She has sought in her suit to prohibit the distribution of the film and any infringing advertisements or merchandise. It was a huge box office failure due to the COVID-19 outbreak.

|$141.9 million

|$141.9 million

|-

|-

|2021

|2021

|

|

|This Disney+ documentary about [[Anthony Fauci]] pretty much does nothing but inflate the titular doctor's ego even more. It also downplays the atrocities he has done before and during the Covid-19 pandamic.

|This Disney+ documentary about [[Anthony Fauci]] pretty much does nothing but inflate the titular doctor's ego even more. It also downplays the atrocities he has done before and during the COVID-19 pandamic.

|

|

|-

|-

|1998

|1998

|PG

|PG

|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], Dreamworks's first animated film downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.

|Produced by [[Jeffrey Katzenberg]], DreamWorks's first animated film downplays the military, and possesses an implicit promotion of Communism via the main character, but also has an Anti-Eugenics message too.

|$90,757,863

|$90,757,863

|-

|-

|1997

|1997

|G

|G

|Paints Christmas in a positive light and has Beast learn its meaning while putting aside the past he had blamed for his curse. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. The manner in which Christmas was depicted, however, was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of the birth of [[Jesus Christ]]. The movie overall, however, is objectively of very low quality and pretty forgettable to say the least, and since it is a direct-to-video sequel/midquel realized by another studio (now defunct) and with a lot of incoherences, it's not even canon in the universe of the original animated classic film that preceeded it.

|Paints Christmas in a positive light and has Beast learn its meaning while putting aside the past he had blamed for his curse. Also significantly tones down the more feminist messaging from the original film. The manner in which Christmas was depicted, however, was closer to the secular view of Christmas than the actual intended meaning of the holiday being a celebration of the birth of [[Jesus Christ]]. The movie overall, however, is objectively of very low quality and pretty forgettable to say the least, and since it is a direct-to-video sequel/midquel realized by another studio (now defunct) and with a lot of incoherences, it's not even canon in the universe of the original animated classic film that preceded it.

|N/A (Direct to video movie)

|N/A (Direct to video movie)

|-

|-

|2018

|2018

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A biopic of [[Freddie Mercury]], the lead singer of the band Queen. While it does show elements of the practice of homosexuality and hedonism, at the same time, the film largely condemns the practice since it was made clear that Mercury's embracing of these things was what ultimately ruined Queen and his personal relationships, and is what ultimately killed him via AIDS. In addition, Paul Prenter, the only other major character to embrace homosexuality in the movie, was depicted in a very negative light, as he was one of the reasons Mercury went down a bad path, with it being made clear later on that Paul largely was using Mercury for his own gratification, blamed others for his bad ideas, and even hid vital information from Mercury deliberately such as the Live Aid concert plans as well as Mary Austin calling him. It also had a promotion of redemption, as Mercury, inspired largely by his former girlfriend/wife, Mary Austin, nearing the end of the film, attempts to reconnect with his band and family and make amends in the time he had left before dying from AIDS. That all being said, however, it's debatable whether the film intended to paint his homosexual escapades in a negative light, as several members of the production company, including Freddie Mercury's actor Rami Malek, indicated that it was a "regrettable" decision as a result of not having enough time to give a "more balanced" view of (ie, promoting) his bisexual lifestyle.

|A biopic of [[Freddie Mercury]], the lead singer of the band Queen. While it does show elements of the practice of homosexuality and hedonism, at the same time, the film largely condemns the practice since it was made clear that Mercury's embracing of these things was what ultimately ruined Queen and his personal relationships, and is what ultimately killed him via AIDS. In addition, Paul Prenter, the only other major character to embrace homosexuality in the movie, was depicted in a very negative light, as he was one of the reasons Mercury went down a bad path, with it being made clear later on that Paul largely was using Mercury for his own gratification, blamed others for his bad ideas, and even hid vital information from Mercury deliberately such as the Live Aid concert plans as well as Mary Austin calling him. It also had a promotion of redemption, as Mercury, inspired largely by his former girlfriend/wife, Mary Austin, nearing the end of the film, attempts to reconnect with his band and family and make amends in the time he had left before dying from AIDS. That all being said, however, it's debatable whether the film intended to paint his homosexual escapades in a negative light, as several members of the production company, including Freddie Mercury's actor Rami Malek, indicated that it was a "regrettable" decision as a result of not having enough time to give a "more balanced" view of (i.e., promoting) his bisexual lifestyle.

|

|

|-

|-

|1995

|1995

|PG-13

|PG-13

|A parody of the famous 1970s sitcom, the Bradys still act like their normal selves even though it’s set in the mid-1990s. The plot is about Mike owing the IRS $20,000 in back taxes, and with his 1970s architectural style not being hip with new clients, and spending a bunch of money on trips to the Grand Canyon and Hawaii, they may have to sell the house, which is what Larry Dittmeyer needs for his plan to turn the neighborhood into a mall. On one hand, the High School counselor is played by the infamous drag queen RuPaul, and Marcia’s friend Noreen is heavily implied to be lesbian. However, Peter, who’s going through puberty, eventually builds up the courage to knock down the bully Eric Dittmeyer and win over his crush, and the Bradys always stick together, regardless of whether the house forecloses or not, even if the road is rough.

|A parody of the famous 1970s sitcom, the Bradys still act like their normal selves even though it's set in the mid-1990s. The plot is about Mike owing the IRS $20,000 in back taxes, and with his 1970s architectural style not being hip with new clients, and spending a bunch of money on trips to the Grand Canyon and Hawaii, they may have to sell the house, which is what Larry Dittmeyer needs for his plan to turn the neighborhood into a mall. On one hand, the High School counselor is played by the infamous drag queen RuPaul, and Marcia's friend Noreen is heavily implied to be lesbian. However, Peter, who's going through puberty, eventually builds up the courage to knock down the bully Eric Dittmeyer and win over his crush, and the Bradys always stick together, regardless of whether the house forecloses or not, even if the road is rough.

Four members of the original cast cameoed in this film being Christopher Knight as a coach who encourages Eric Dittmeyer to beat up Peter, Barry Williams as a record producer who turns down Greg after hearing him sing “Til I Met You (Clowns Never Laughed Before),” Ann B. Davis as a truck driver who finds Jan, and returns her home, and [[Florence Henderson]] as Carol’s mother. Mike Lookinland was supposed to be a background cop, but that scene got cut.

Four members of the original cast cameoed in this film being Christopher Knight as a coach who encourages Eric Dittmeyer to beat up Peter, Barry Williams as a record producer who turns down Greg after hearing him sing “Til I Met You (Clowns Never Laughed Before),” Ann B. Davis as a truck driver who finds Jan, and returns her home, and [[Florence Henderson]] as Carol's mother. Mike Lookinland was supposed to be a background cop, but that scene got cut.

|$54.1 million

|$54.1 million

|-

|-

|2010

|2010

|PG

|PG

|This film is environmentalism and anti-[[Capitalist|capitalist]] on steroids. A wealthy businessman and his employees are the antagonists for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after "learning the animals' stories," and he even puts up a poster stating that anyone who violates forest preservation laws will be fined $1,000,000.00. However, the film is also pro-family, as well as taking a jab at LGBT, with a joke of the protagonist being forced to wear his wife's clothes after the animals steal his, this is played for laughs and is clearly anti-[[cross dressing]]. (Though they are wearing again in the end credits).   

|This film is environmentalism and anti-[[capitalist]] on steroids. A wealthy businessman and his employees are the antagonists for doing their job. One of them gets attacked by a raccoon. In the end, the main character, a real estate developer, is forced to change his job after "learning the animals' stories," and he even puts up a poster stating that anyone who violates forest preservation laws will be fined $1,000,000.00. However, the film is also pro-family, as well as taking a jab at LGBT, with a joke of the protagonist being forced to wear his wife's clothes after the animals steal his, this is played for laughs and is clearly anti-[[cross dressing]]. (Though they are wearing again in the end credits).   

|$35,000,000

|$35,000,000

|-

|-

|2000

|2000

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Based on Barry Williams’ 1992 autobiography of the same name, it tells the story of Barry Williams playing Greg Brady on ''The Brady Bunch,'' along with Williams doing questionable stuff such as smoking weed and getting co-star Maureen McCormick to do it, along with taking TV mom Florence Henderson on a date after he initially striking out with McCormick, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny. It also covers Robert Reed’s feud with series creator and executive producer [[Sherwood Schwartz]] over the show’s incredibly cheesy tone.

|Based on Barry Williams’ 1992 autobiography of the same name, it tells the story of Barry Williams playing Greg Brady on ''The Brady Bunch,'' along with Williams doing questionable stuff such as smoking weed and getting co-star Maureen McCormick to do it, along with taking TV mom Florence Henderson on a date after he initially striking out with McCormick, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny. It also covers Robert Reed's feud with series creator and executive producer [[Sherwood Schwartz]] over the show's incredibly cheesy tone.

It doesn’t condemn Robert Reed’s homosexuality, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny.

It doesn't condemn Robert Reed's homosexuality, and shows that Mike Lookinland wanting to make out with Susan Olsen as funny.

|N/A (TV Movie)  

|N/A (TV Movie)  

|-

|-

To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris is also the victim of arson late into the film. The song 'Hellfire' was also notorious for making explicit references to lust. Not necessarily a bad or negative thing, it can be considered courageous, original, surprising, and entertaining artistically speaking, and for families with kids who are not "snowflakes". However, this is in stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''[[The Jungle Book]]'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). However, on the other hand, other films from the Walt's era were more dark with particular horror and dramatic elements than their original counterparts and source materials, like ''[[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs]]'', ''[[Pinocchio]]'' (with evil and sadistic Stromboli unlike his novel countepart Mangiafuoco, the demonic and sa distici Coachman and all the cursed Pleasure Island with the impressive children turning into donkeys scene, and the terrifying whale Monstro), all the ''[[Night on Bald Mountain]]'' segment in ''[[Fantasia]]'' (with Chernabog and even harpies showing bare breasts, though for a few seconds), ''[[Dumbo]]'' (with its Pink Elephants on Parade allucination caused by accidental consumption of alcohol), ''[[Bambi]]'' (for the (in)famous scene of the death of Bambi's mother), ''[[Sleeping Beauty]]'' and ''[[101 Dalmatians]]'', this latter two specifically for their villains' scenes (Maleficent and Cruella De Vil). The Gypsies were also depicted in a more positive light, to the extent that they, at times, were considered preferable to Christianity, despite Gypsies essentially being pagans. Hints at race swapping were also included in the film, as Esmerelda was made into an ethnic gypsy in the movie, when in the original book, she was actually a blonde Parisienne and the daughter of an anchoress who was abducted by the gypsies and made into their own.

To make the film even darker, a gypsy genocide plot is introduced, and Paris is also the victim of arson late into the film. The song 'Hellfire' was also notorious for making explicit references to lust. Not necessarily a bad or negative thing, it can be considered courageous, original, surprising, and entertaining artistically speaking, and for families with kids who are not "snowflakes". However, this is in stark contrast to most other Disney film adaptations, which have a history of toning down the original works (as in ''[[The Jungle Book]]'', where Disney advised the writers to ignore the book specifically because its contents were unsuitable for children). However, on the other hand, other films from the Walt's era were more dark with particular horror and dramatic elements than their original counterparts and source materials, like ''[[Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs]]'', ''[[Pinocchio]]'' (with evil and sadistic Stromboli unlike his novel countepart Mangiafuoco, the demonic and sa distici Coachman and all the cursed Pleasure Island with the impressive children turning into donkeys scene, and the terrifying whale Monstro), all the ''[[Night on Bald Mountain]]'' segment in ''[[Fantasia]]'' (with Chernabog and even harpies showing bare breasts, though for a few seconds), ''[[Dumbo]]'' (with its Pink Elephants on Parade allucination caused by accidental consumption of alcohol), ''[[Bambi]]'' (for the (in)famous scene of the death of Bambi's mother), ''[[Sleeping Beauty]]'' and ''[[101 Dalmatians]]'', this latter two specifically for their villains' scenes (Maleficent and Cruella De Vil). The Gypsies were also depicted in a more positive light, to the extent that they, at times, were considered preferable to Christianity, despite Gypsies essentially being pagans. Hints at race swapping were also included in the film, as Esmerelda was made into an ethnic gypsy in the movie, when in the original book, she was actually a blonde Parisienne and the daughter of an anchoress who was abducted by the gypsies and made into their own.

Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is male according to some descriptions (voiced, however, by a female voice-actress and fans mostly refer to it as a female goat, and probably the gargoyle confused Djali with a female goat, assumption supported by his known clear stupidity), which may have meant that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame (and also comes across as extremely hypocritical and blasphemous due to homosexuality being tolerated even less by God than Frollo's lust for Esmerelda, based on God explicitly referring to the concept as an abomination in Leviticus as well as his destroying Sodom and Gomorrah largely because of the practice of homosexuality). However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split-off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness. This doesn't explain, however, their scenes when Quasimodo is absent, how animals (especially Esmeralda's goat) can see them alive, the damage thev do to Frollo's soldiers in the climax, and their constant change of positions when they stop animating themselves.<ref> '''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...

Worst of all, one of the male gargoyles falls in love with Djali, who is male according to some descriptions (voiced, however, by a female voice-actress and fans mostly refer to it as a female goat, and probably the gargoyle confused Djali with a female goat, assumption supported by his known clear stupidity), which may have meant that liberals will subtly shoehorn the homosexual agenda into anything, even the gargoyles of Notre Dame (and also comes across as extremely hypocritical and blasphemous due to homosexuality being tolerated even less by God than Frollo's lust for Esmerelda, based on God explicitly referring to the concept as an abomination in Leviticus as well as his destroying Sodom and Gomorrah largely because of the practice of homosexuality). However, this should be taken with a grain of salt, because the DVD audio commentary Kirk Wise (co-director), Gary Trousdale (co-director), and Don Hahn (producer) suggest that it's possible that the three gargoyles exist purely in Quasimodo's mind and are in fact split-off portions of his own personality created to deal with his loneliness. This doesn't explain, however, their scenes when Quasimodo is absent, how animals (especially Esmeralda's goat) can see them alive, the damage thev do to Frollo's soldiers in the climax, and their constant change of positions when they stop animating themselves.<ref>'''Gary Trousdale:''' We've always operated under the assumption that the gargoyles were kind of figments of Quasimodo's imagination. They didn't really move around, or did they? You know...

'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.

'''Kirk Wise:''' Yeah, we like leaving a little bit of a question mark; kind of like Harvey the rabbit or Calvin and Hobbes.

'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.

'''Gary Trousdale:''' They're inanimate when anybody else comes in the room. They don't talk to anybody else, except the goat. So that's here we kind of crossed the line a little bit.

'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy. </ref>. So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. On a positive note, it is to be noted that the directors admitted that the implication that Hugo lusted after Djali was a line that even the directors admitted they shouldn't have crossed, which is a rarity ''especially'' in today's media where they are all for crossing said line.

'''Kirk Wise:''' We like to keep it a little bit iffy.</ref> So this matter could have less to do with the liberal agenda and more to do with poor writing. On a positive note, it is to be noted that the directors admitted that the implication that Hugo lusted after Djali was a line that even the directors admitted they shouldn't have crossed, which is a rarity ''especially'' in today's media where they are all for crossing said line.

|$100,138,851   

|$100,138,851   

|-

|-

|2019

|2019

|PG

|PG

|Although it contains the chivalry and capitalist themes from the original animated film. This both race and gender swapped live-action remake of the timeless animated classic of the same name shows the Democrat Jim Crow South of the early 1900s as a delusional and misleading multiethnic and multicultural paradise, with also totally legal interracial marriages. Compared to the animated counterparts, the animal characters are soulless, inexpressive, and unbearable if not even creepy to watch when they "talk". Jim Dear, white here like in the source material, is legally married to Darling but here changed to a black American woman and with a black-mixed daughter named Lulu instead of a son named Jim, Jr.. Even Aunt Sarah is cast in black in this live-action version, and she loses the redeeming qualities she had in the original animated film. The neighbor dog and dear Lady's friend Jock is female here, while the antagonistic and mischievous Aunt Sarah's iconic female Siamese cats, Si & Am, are now two male Devon Rex cats named Devon & Rex, with a totally different and much less memorable musical number. The rat, "Herman", is still the main villain and antagonist, but far less intimidating and scary-looking than the animated counterpart, and despite his musical theme being memorable, the same cannot be said for the final fight scene when compared to the animated version.

|Although it contains the chivalry and capitalist themes from the original animated film. This both race and gender swapped live-action remake of the timeless animated classic of the same name shows the Democrat Jim Crow South of the early 1900s as a delusional and misleading multiethnic and multicultural paradise, with also totally legal interracial marriages. Compared to the animated counterparts, the animal characters are soulless, inexpressive, and unbearable if not even creepy to watch when they "talk". Jim Dear, white here like in the source material, is legally married to Darling but here changed to a black American woman and with a black-mixed daughter named Lulu instead of a son named Jim Jr.. Even Aunt Sarah is cast in black in this live-action version, and she loses the redeeming qualities she had in the original animated film. The neighbor dog and dear Lady's friend Jock is female here, while the antagonistic and mischievous Aunt Sarah's iconic female Siamese cats, Si & Am, are now two male Devon Rex cats named Devon & Rex, with a totally different and much less memorable musical number. The rat, "Herman", is still the main villain and antagonist, but far less intimidating and scary-looking than the animated counterpart, and despite his musical theme being memorable, the same cannot be said for the final fight scene when compared to the animated version.

|-

|-

|''Legally Blonde''

|''Legally Blonde''

|2008-2012

|2008-2012

|PG-13

|PG-13

|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire|vampires]], but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].

|Starred by anti-military liberal [[Kristen Stewart]] and glorifies [[vampire]]s, but it also makes fun of [[public school culture]] and [[modernism]] while promoting [[abstinence]] until marriage, traditional courtship and marriage, and the [[pro-life]] movement. It was written by a [[Mormon]].

|$1,365,922,346

|$1,365,922,346

|-

|-