Changes

#correction of a mistranslation of the Greek term for "wrist"<ref>The same Greek term is used in Acts 12:7 ([[NIV]])- "the chains fell off Peter’s wrists."</ref> confirms that the [[Shroud of Turin]] is correct in showing the nail wounds in Jesus' wrists rather than his hands, and thus was not a medieval forgery when all mistakenly felt the nails went through his hands;

#correction of a mistranslation of the Greek term for "wrist"<ref>The same Greek term is used in Acts 12:7 ([[NIV]])- "the chains fell off Peter’s wrists."</ref> confirms that the [[Shroud of Turin]] is correct in showing the nail wounds in Jesus' wrists rather than his hands, and thus was not a medieval forgery when all mistakenly felt the nails went through his hands;

#The [[Bible]] can be translated into [[mathematical]] expressions to enrich understanding of it and of math: {{bibleref|John|1|1}} can be translated as "∃ Word(t=0) ∧ Word(t₀) ∼ God ∧ Word(t₀) ≡ God"; also, the ending of {{bibleref|James|1|17}} can be translated as "''d(God)/dt'' = 0 ('no variation') and ''d²(God)/dt²'' = 0 (second derivative - no 'shadow of turning')";

#The [[Bible]] can be translated into [[mathematical]] expressions to enrich understanding of it and of math: {{bibleref|John|1|1}} can be translated as "∃ Word(t=0) ∧ Word(t₀) ∼ God ∧ Word(t₀) ≡ God"; also, the ending of {{bibleref|James|1|17}} can be translated as "''d(God)/dt'' = 0 ('no variation') and ''d²(God)/dt²'' = 0 (second derivative - no 'shadow of turning')";

#tantalizing historical mysteries exist in the [[Bible]], such as whether [[Jesus]]'s disciples had a "[[Mole (espionage)|mole]]" trusted by the high priestst,<ref>''See'' [[John_the_Apostle#.22another_disciple.22_mystery_at_John_18:15|"another disciple" mystery at John 18:15]].</ref> which makes Bible analysis today as fascinating as any mysteries in science, math, and forensics;

#tantalizing historical mysteries exist in the [[Bible]], such as whether [[Jesus]]'s disciples had a "[[Mole (espionage)|mole]]" trusted by the high priest,<ref>''See'' [[John_the_Apostle#.22another_disciple.22_mystery_at_John_18:15|"another disciple" mystery at John 18:15]].</ref> which makes Bible analysis today as fascinating as any mysteries in science, math, and forensics;

#the [[liberal media]] dilutes and corrupts the connotations of key [[English]] words over time, such that the true power and benefits of the [[Bible]] require constantly updating the English terminology to convey;

#the [[liberal media]] dilutes and corrupts the connotations of key [[English]] words over time, such that the true power and benefits of the [[Bible]] require constantly updating the English terminology to convey;

#[[Greek language|ancient Greek]] was underdeveloped as to certain concepts, such as [[infinity|infinite]] and [[pro-life]], and translation of the [[New Testament]] is more enlightening, beneficial, and complete when it utilizes [[Best New Conservative Words|modern conservative terminology]];

#[[Greek language|ancient Greek]] was underdeveloped as to certain concepts, such as [[infinity|infinite]] and [[pro-life]], and translation of the [[New Testament]] is more enlightening, beneficial, and complete when it utilizes [[Best New Conservative Words|modern conservative terminology]];

#the archaic word "disciple" (used 261x by [[ESV]]) is better translated as "student" today, as the meaning of the Greek term is "learner",<ref>https://biblehub.com/greek/3101.htm</ref> and today "student" captures and conveys that meaning the best;

#the archaic word "disciple" (used 261x by [[ESV]]) is better translated as "student" today, as the meaning of the Greek term is "learner",<ref>https://biblehub.com/greek/3101.htm</ref> and today "student" captures and conveys that meaning the best;

#"[[God's paradise]]" should be used rather than "[[kingdom of God]]" (used 69x by [[KJV]]) and "infinite life" rather than "[[eternal life]]" (26x by [[KJV]]), in order to fully convey the immediate benefits intended by the original text;

#"[[God's paradise]]" should be used rather than "[[kingdom of God]]" (used 69x by [[KJV]]) and "infinite life" rather than "[[eternal life]]" (26x by [[KJV]]), in order to fully convey the immediate benefits intended by the original text;

#"[[Theophilus]]", the named recipient of 27% of the [[New Testament]] as written by [[Luke]], is the same word "loved by [[God]]" referenced independently by {{bibleref|John|3|16}}, and all the [[Gospels]] were written for everyone contrary to [[liberal denial]] concerning intended audiences;

#"[[Theophilus]]", the named recipient of 27% of the [[New Testament]] as written by [[Luke]], is the same concept of "loved by [[God]]" referenced independently by {{bibleref|John|3|16}}, and all the [[Gospels]] were written for everyone contrary to [[liberal denial]] concerning intended audiences;

#the expression "[[harden not your hearts]]" (3x by [[KJV]]) is better translated for [[liberal]]s today as "close not your minds," as the original [[Greek]] also means "stubbornness of mind" which is common among university-indoctrinated liberals;

#the expression "[[harden not your hearts]]" (3x by [[KJV]]) is better translated for [[liberal]]s today as "close not your minds," as the original [[Greek]] also means "stubbornness of mind" which is common among university-indoctrinated liberals;

#the [[Gospel of Mark]] was the fearless work of the outsider [[Gentile]] eyewitness [[Mark]], whose mother [[Salome]] was among the first to see the empty tomb after the [[Resurrection]]; [[liberal denial]] conceals this history to discourage conversion by Gentiles to [[Christianity]];<ref>[[Salome]], mentioned by {{bible ref|Mark|16|1}}, was likely [[Mark]]'s [[Aramaic]] mother who made Mark an eyewitness who initiated [[the Gospels]].</ref>

#the [[Gospel of Mark]] was the fearless work of the outsider [[Gentile]] eyewitness [[Mark]], whose mother [[Salome]] was among the first to see the empty tomb after the [[Resurrection]]; [[liberal denial]] conceals this history to discourage conversion by Gentiles to [[Christianity]];<ref>[[Salome]], mentioned by {{bible ref|Mark|16|1}}, was likely [[Mark]]'s [[Aramaic]] mother who made Mark an eyewitness who initiated [[the Gospels]].</ref>

#translation committees are biased by their secret deliberations without public input, without insights from anyone having a [[STEM]] background, and without the perspective of [[Amish]] and other independent perspectives;

#translation committees are biased by their secret deliberations without public input, without insights from anyone having a [[STEM]] background, and without the perspective of [[Amish]] and other independent perspectives;

#the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref>

#the [[Gospel of John]] is incredibly powerful and life-changing, and even more so when occasional [[liberal]] "[[Editorial Comments in the Gospel of John|asides]]" that were later inserted into it are recognized as not part of the original;<ref>''See'' [[Undiluted Gospel of John]].</ref>

#John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it,"<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> When a stronger rendition would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also facilitates a greater appreciation of the interplay between physical light and darkness.

#John 1:5 is an immensely powerful verse, but diluted in most translations with a past tense and weak negative "did not overcome": "That light shines in the darkness, yet the darkness did not overcome it";<ref>This quotation is from the [[HCSB]]. The Greek uses the Aorist Indicative Active (simple past tense - literally, "not overcame"), despite using the Present Indicative Active for "shines". https://biblehub.com/john/1-5.htm#lexicon</ref> a stronger rendering would be "That light shines in the darkness, and the darkness succumbed to it." This wonderful verse also highlights the interplay between physical light and darkness.

#the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide - e.g., "the unsearchable riches of [[Christ]]" should be "the infinite riches of Christ";<ref>{{Bibleref|Ephesians|3|8}} ([[ESV]]). As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and

#the innovative, mind-bending, and powerful use of the logic of [[infinity]] in [[the Gospels]], which [[liberal]] translators today downplay or hide - e.g., "the unsearchable riches of [[Christ]]" should be "the infinite riches of Christ";<ref>{{Bibleref|Ephesians|3|8}} ([[ESV]]). As an illustration from the [[Old Testament]], in 1599 the [[Geneva Bible]] correctly translated {{bibleref|Psalms|147|5}} as the "infinite" wisdom of [[God]], but most modern English translations fail to use "infinite" there.</ref> and

#[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors.

#[[O’Sullivan’s First Law]]: any endeavor that is not actually [[conservative]] will inevitably be distorted and ruined by [[liberal]]s, including [[Bible]] translation by [[college]] professors.