Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
58,551
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 29:
Line 29: − +
→Intelligent design theorists on the implications of Richard Lenski's experiment: clean up, typos fixed: ’s → 's
The biologist [[Michael Behe]] criticized Richard Lenski's claims concerning the significance of his experiment (see: [http://behe.uncommondescent.com/2008/06/multiple-mutations-needed-for-e-coli/ Multiple Mutations Needed for E. Coli] by Michael Behe).
The biologist [[Michael Behe]] criticized Richard Lenski's claims concerning the significance of his experiment (see: [http://behe.uncommondescent.com/2008/06/multiple-mutations-needed-for-e-coli/ Multiple Mutations Needed for E. Coli] by Michael Behe).
Jonathon Witt of the [[Discovery Institute]] indicates that the biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen punctured the evolutionists' claims for Richard Lenski’s long-term evolution experiment (see: [https://evolutionnews.org/2021/06/biologist-dustin-van-hofwegen-punctures-claims-for-lenskis-long-term-evolution-experiment/ Biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen Punctures Claims for Lenski’s Long-Term Evolution Experiment]).
Jonathon Witt of the [[Discovery Institute]] indicates that the biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen punctured the evolutionists' claims for Richard Lenski's long-term evolution experiment (see: [https://evolutionnews.org/2021/06/biologist-dustin-van-hofwegen-punctures-claims-for-lenskis-long-term-evolution-experiment/ Biologist Dustin Van Hofwegen Punctures Claims for Lenski’s Long-Term Evolution Experiment]).
== References ==
== References ==