Changes

'''Note 1'''

:Here [[The New Jerome]] blatantly and illogically goes against well established history to state "Seleucus II Callinicus (246-226), devastated the land, and carried off enormous booty to Egypt." Such emeritus scholars to state such can only be maintaining a narrative to match the RSV & NAB on which their work is based.<ref>https://archive.org/details/the-new-jerome-biblical-commentary/page/418/mode/2up</ref>  For not even [[Jerome]] asserted this in his original work.

:'''[[Jerome]]:''' - In all points the same<ref>[[Jerome]], ''[[Commentary on Daniel (Jerome)|Commentary on Daniel]], 11.6<br>https://archive.org/details/20200508-commentary-on-daniel/page/122/mode/2up, retrieved 2026-10-28</ref>

 

:'''[[Isaac Newton]]:''' - Newton seems to be mistaken here, claiming with a general statement that consequentiall the Seleucid kings in the north repeatedly carried off prisoners from [[Egypt]], yet modern established sequences have well established that this was not the case.  [[Original Source: Sir Isaac Newton - Observations on Daniel, Chapter 11#6|See original source here]]<ref>[[Isaac Newton]], ''[[Observations on the Prophecies of Daniel]]'',  [[Original Source: Sir Isaac Newton - Observations on Daniel, Chapter 11#6|11.6]]</ref>.

 

:'''[[The New Jerome]]:''' - Like Newton, the New Jerome editors, blatantly and illogically goes against well established history.  While Newton can be forgiven not haveing access to modern libraries, to state "Seleucus II Callinicus (246-226), devastated the land, and carried off enormous booty to Egypt" is a large fabrication.  Such emeritus scholars to state such can only be maintaining a narrative to match the RSV & NAB on which their work is based.<ref>https://archive.org/details/the-new-jerome-biblical-commentary/page/418/mode/2up</ref>  For not even [[Jerome]] asserted this in his original work.

=Daniel 11:9=

=Daniel 11:9=