Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1,815: Line 1,815:  
|2026
 
|2026
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation of ''[[Animal Farm]]'' goes against a lot of what the original story stood for, becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell "rolling in his grave."
+
|Shockingly distributed by Angel Studios, Andy Serkis's adaptation of ''[[Animal Farm]]'' goes against a lot of what the original story stood for, becoming a generic kids' movie with a sinister undertone. This cautionary tale about communism has been turned into a screed against capitalism, with Pilkington (reimagined as a woman in this adaptation) serving as a blatant expy of Elon Musk, showing that the left has never forgiven Musk for teaming up with President Donald Trump. This also implies that the pigs only turned evil because of capitalism; while Orwell himself had criticisms of capitalism, the movie's message keeps getting hammered over the audience's head. Both sides of the political aisle met it with complete derision, with some joking that the windmill in the movie would be a generator fueled by Orwell "rolling in his grave."
 
|$6.5 million
 
|$6.5 million
−
|-
  −
|''Lesbian Space Princess''
  −
|2025
  −
|R
  −
|This Australian [[woke]] liberal movie glorifies the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[transgender]] lifestyles and shoves it down everyone's throats. It portrays white people and straight men as insufferable jerks who are only into sex and control, consisting of jokes about sex and organ functions for the sake of [[nihilism]]. It was so bad that even liberals, the LGBTQ community and every online community of the internet hated this movie. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, with Conservatives criticizing the film for its gay themes, while liberals criticized it for its "poor representation of LGBT."
  −
|N/A
  −
|-
  −
|''Spermageddon'' (Norway)
  −
|2024
  −
|R
  −
|This horrifyingly adult animated film glorifies unsafe sexual practices, with two rebellious underage teenagers engaging in graphic sex and promoting teenage pregnancy. The scenes with John's visible erection are not only distracting, but also very disturbing since he's still a teenager at 16 years old. Yes, the age of consent in Norway is 16, but it's still unpleasant to see.
  −
|$1.4 million
  −
|-
  −
|''Nimona''
  −
|2023
  −
|PG (should be rated R)
  −
|Based on the 2015 graphic novel of the same name by ND Stevenson, this [[satanic]] film promotes disorderly conduct, nonconformity, satanism and the [[homosexual agenda]]. Nimona, the main protagonist, is a lesbian who defies Christianity in this obvious metaphor for [[nihilism]]. The film also features Ambrosius Goldenloin and Ballister Blackheart's gay relationship. The movie was banned in several Arab Muslim countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia due to its gay content.
  −
|N/A
   
|-
 
|-
 
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)
 
|''Animals United'' (Konferenz der Tiere in German)
 
|2010
 
|2010
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans, which had caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. This movie, based on a children's book, promotes a heavy environmentalist message, with the animals saying that all humans are causing harm worldwide (such as melting a polar bear's snowy home and setting the Outback on fire). The movie's ending amps up the environmental message to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.
+
|A goofy meerkat and a pacifistic lion journey with other animals from around the world (a polar bear, two tortoises, a kangaroo, a Tasmanian devil, and a rooster) to take down a dam built by humans that caused the Okavango Delta to dry up. Based on a children's book, the movie promotes a heavy-handed environmental message, with the animals saying humans are harming the world (such as melting a polar bear's snowy home and setting the Outback on fire). The movie's ending amps up the environmental message to eleven, with many animals storming the cities and news reporters saying the animals will make humans pay for ruining the world.
 
|£2,133,051
 
|£2,133,051
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,845: Line 1,827:  
|1998
 
|1998
 
|G
 
|G
−
|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent.  Not only does it vilify businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard) What is harder to excuse is pushing the point of white/European guilt of what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and the negative reception were ultimately responsible for the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise.  
+
|This film, unlike the other three ''American Tail'' films, definitely has a liberal bent, such as vilifying businessmen (though it, I suppose, was mocking the Robber Barons and might have had some merit in that regard). What is harder to excuse is pushing the point of white/European guilt over what happened to the Native Americans, even making Fievel, who himself fled from a bad situation in Russia, somehow feel responsible for the plight of the Native American mice.  This film and its negative reception ultimately led to the death of the ''American Tail'' franchise.  
 
|N/A (direct to video)  
 
|N/A (direct to video)  
 
|-     
 
|-     
Line 1,863: Line 1,845:  
|2006
 
|2006
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Set in a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of actual humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then he gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with being the leader of his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' accepts disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious and dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid the temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].
+
|Set in a barnyard where animals speak and behave like humans in the absence of humans, this ''Lion King'' clone stars a bull who witnesses his father die after being wounded by coyotes, then gradually accepts the responsibilities that come with leading his animal community. Nevertheless, ''Barnyard'' tolerates disorderly conduct because the animals still party recklessly, even with a serious, dedicated bull in charge. Plus, it portrays humans as either ignorant or stupid and persecutes coyotes for being carnivores. The neurotic ferret Freddy goes to liberal lengths to avoid the temptation to eat his rooster friend by becoming a [[vegetarianism|vegetarian]]. Not only that, but the bulls lack horns and have female udders, and there are brief scenes referencing alcohol and [[gambling]].
 
|$116,500,000
 
|$116,500,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,875: Line 1,857:  
|2012
 
|2012
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Mérida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cause her to lose her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Mérida was added to the Disney Princess lineup regardless of the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and was created by Pixar, not by Disney directly. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.
+
|One of Pixar's less memorable animations stars Mérida, a feminist Medieval Scottish princess who refuses to marry, believing it will cost her her life of archery and adventure, thus demonstrating poor family values throughout. Of course, because this is a feminist propaganda piece, the men in the film are oafish compared to the women, too. Egregiously, Mérida was added to the Disney Princess lineup despite the poor morals she demonstrates throughout the film, and Pixar, not Disney directly, created her. It also has a setting similar to the Great Conservative Film ''How to Train Your Dragon'', which was released two years earlier.
 
|$540.4 million  
 
|$540.4 million  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,899: Line 1,881:  
|2008
 
|2008
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so horribly at the box office that it was criticized for potentially traumatizing young children and was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer-animated film of all time.
+
|This [[pagan]] film has horrible scenes of violence, war, and mass murder. It performed so poorly at the box office that critics said it could traumatize young children, and it was pulled from theaters after a week. It is currently the lowest-grossing computer-animated film of all time.
 
|$694,782
 
|$694,782
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,947: Line 1,929:  
|2011
 
|2011
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', this penguin movie does not push the envelope too much in terms of sexual humor, but it goes even further with environmental themes, pushing the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda" />
+
|Like the first ''Happy Feet'', this penguin movie doesn't push the envelope much in terms of sexual humor, but it goes further with environmental themes, pushing the global warming agenda. Staunch liberal actors Matt Damon and Brad Pitt voice two krill who are implied to be homosexual.<ref name="6 Kids Films Filled with Green Propaganda" />
 
|$64,006,466
 
|$64,006,466
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,960: Line 1,942:  
|Not Rated
 
|Not Rated
 
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a 2004 sequel, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.
 
|This animation bastardizes a horrific, tragic historical event in the name of making a statement against the whaling industry. It even has a 2004 sequel, which is not only horrible but also flat-out bizarre.
−
|
+
|N/A
 +
|-
 +
|''Lesbian Space Princess''
 +
|2025
 +
|R
 +
|This Australian [[woke]] liberal movie glorifies the [[homosexual agenda]] and [[transgender]] lifestyles and shoves it down everyone's throats. It portrays white people and straight men as insufferable jerks who are only into sex and control, consisting of jokes about sex and organ functions for the sake of [[nihilism]]. It was so bad that even liberals, the LGBTQ community, and every online community on the internet hated this movie. It was met with complete derision by both sides of the political aisle, with Conservatives criticizing the film for its gay themes, while liberals criticized it for its "poor representation of LGBT."
 +
|N/A
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Lightyear''
 
|''Lightyear''
Line 1,979: Line 1,967:  
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention, it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel, titled ''The Rise of Gru'', was released in 2022.
 
|This spinoff prequel to the ''Despicable Me'' films begins with the "evolution" of the minions, which flies in the face of the creationist truth. The film shows the minions evolving from single-cell organisms in the ocean, suggesting that God does not exist. This film also glorifies criminality. Not to mention, it seems to sympathize with a family that has robbed a bank, an action which is congruent with the liberal idea of not working hard for wealth. A sequel, titled ''The Rise of Gru'', was released in 2022.
 
|$1.159 billion
 
|$1.159 billion
 +
|-
 +
|''Nimona''
 +
|2023
 +
|PG (should be rated R)
 +
|Based on the 2015 graphic novel of the same name by ND Stevenson, this [[satanic]] film promotes disorderly conduct, nonconformity, satanism, and the [[homosexual agenda]]. Nimona, the main protagonist, is a lesbian who defies Christianity in this obvious metaphor for [[nihilism]]. The film also features Ambrosius Goldenloin and Ballister Blackheart's gay relationship. The movie was banned in several Arab Muslim countries such as Iran and Saudi Arabia due to its gay content.
 +
|N/A
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Norm of the North''
 
|''Norm of the North''
Line 1,989: Line 1,983:  
|2014
 
|2014
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel finds himself helping his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, which celebrates disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One of the antagonists is a head businessman because he does not comply with environmentalism.
+
|An incorrigibly self-serving exiled squirrel helps his former park creatures survive by raiding a nut store, celebrating disorderly conduct, nonconformity, and environmentalism. One antagonist is a head businessman because he doesn't comply with environmentalism. A sequel, ''Nutty by Nature'', was released in 2017.
 
|$64,251,541
 
|$64,251,541
 
|-
 
|-
Line 1,997: Line 1,991:  
|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.
 
|In the sequel to ''The Nut Job'', the businessman villain returns to try to build an amusement park, again persecuted for not being an environmentalist.
 
|$26,989,904
 
|$26,989,904
 +
|-
 +
|''Onward''
 +
|2020
 +
|PG
 +
|This movie glorified much of the [[homosexual agenda]] and normalized gay relationships. Specter, a cyclops cop for the city of New Mushroomton, is a lesbian who has an unnamed "girlfriend" and has an unnamed "daughter". The movie was banned in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia because of this. On January 27, 2020, two months before the film was released, a San Francisco tattoo artist named Sweet Cecily Daniher filed a copyright lawsuit against Disney, Pixar, and Onward producer Kori Rae, believing that Pixar had copied the design of her Vanicorn in violation of her rental agreement with the company, as well as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act, and the California Artists Protection Act. She sought to prohibit the distribution of the film and any infringing advertisements or merchandise. It was a huge box office failure due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
 +
|$141.9 million
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Open Season''
 
|''Open Season''
Line 2,007: Line 2,007:  
|2006
 
|2006
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes. At the same time, humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by "backstabbing, betraying, and murdering" those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.
+
|Based upon the comic strip of the same name, animals struggling to steal food from trash for the winter are the heroes. At the same time, humans are painted as ignorant, uncaring towards animals (clearly an environmentalist message), and obsessed with food. Plus, a businesswoman is the main antagonist, and an exterminator is scorned for simply doing his job. In addition, one of the other main antagonists of the film (and the only animal main antagonist), Vincent the Bear, is villainized for forcing RJ the Raccoon to replace the food he had after the latter, in a botched attempt to steal food that Vincent had hoarded for the winter, ended up accidentally destroying the food stash, with an ad-libbed scene in the climax having Vincent admit that he got where he was by "backstabbing, betraying, and murdering" those that placed trust in him, which can be interpreted as a dig against Capitalism and the concept of private property.
 
|$155,019,340
 
|$155,019,340
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,013: Line 2,013:  
|2012
 
|2012
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, is homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision had been made by the director Chris Butler.
+
|The very ending of the film pulls a swerve and reveals that one of the characters, Mitch Downe, is homosexual, ignoring the fact that he was not even implied to be that earlier. This decision was made by the director, Chris Butler.
 
|$107.1 million
 
|$107.1 million
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,019: Line 2,019:  
|2018
 
|2018
 
|G
 
|G
−
|The movie was a complete trashing of the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by having the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, be vilified simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was such that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic," that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel, ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'', was released in 2021.
+
|The movie completely trashes the popular British children's book series of the same name, promoting environmentalism by vilifying the rightful owner of the farm, Thomas MacGregor, simply for trying to farm the vegetable garden that legally belonged to him. At the same time, the various wild animals are portrayed positively in interfering with his business. One of their plans against MacGregor even goes so far as to have Peter Rabbit murder him by exploiting a food allergy that he had, and it is treated positively. It was so much so that even the liberal website [[TV Tropes]] grudgingly acknowledged, in the articles "Unintentionally Sympathetic" and "Unintentionally Unsympathetic," that Thomas was closer to being in the right than Peter and his friends were. A sequel, ''Peter Rabbit 2: The Runaway'', was released in 2021.
 
|$146,983,492
 
|$146,983,492
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,025: Line 2,025:  
|1995
 
|1995
 
|G
 
|G
−
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native American's view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig against capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  
+
|This feminist story follows a highly fictionalized account of the life of [[Native American]] [[Pocahontas]] with an environmental message; and the Native Americans' view against English settlers is similar to Howard Zinn's revisionist history textbook ''A People's History of the United States'', which would enter public knowledge and be provided to universities, colleges, and high schools across America two years later (see ''Good Will Hunting''). The titular character enters what is implied to be an unfaithful relationship with John Smith over fellow Native American Kokoum, and her decision is treated in a comparatively positive light; while the English settlers are vilified simply for establishing the early American colonies to find Jamestown, and John Ratcliffe in particular was demonized as having the motive of trying to establish a gold mine and being greedy, despite gold never being the motive for Ratcliffe, which could be interpreted as a dig at capitalism. Also, unlike the film character, who was the victim of a mutiny, the real one was killed in an ambush by Powhatan Indians in 1609, along with 14 other men.  
   −
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.
+
Following the Best Picture nomination of ''Beauty and the Beast'' at the 64th Academy Awards and its subsequent loss in March 1992, then-studio chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg opted to produce another animated sweeping romantic epic in hopes of achieving a cinematic masterpiece status and replicating another Best Picture nomination, even if he intended to distort history and add both a love story and environmental themes. In fact, many people at Disney had high hopes for ''Pocahontas'', while deeming the concept of another film in production, ''The Lion King,'' as experimental. To their surprise, ''The Lion King'' became one of the greatest animated motion pictures of all time, while ''Pocahontas'' received mixed critical reviews and below-expected box office receipts.
 
|$141,579,773
 
|$141,579,773
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,033: Line 2,033:  
|1998
 
|1998
 
|G
 
|G
−
|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy as a Disney animated musical film (Warner Bros produced this film), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>
+
|This revisionist take on Arthurian legend throws everything that makes the source material great (Christianity, heroism, bravery, etc.) out the window for the sake of advocating feminism and wanting to be as worthy as a Disney animated musical film (Warner Bros. produced this film), only to be panned by critics in the end. Even though it's supposed to be a G-rated family comedy, an incest joke appears as well.<ref>https://www.imdb.com/character/ch0100869/quotes</ref>
 
|$22,510,798
 
|$22,510,798
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,039: Line 2,039:  
|2016
 
|2016
 
|R
 
|R
−
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into thinking that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g. humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a "religious obligation". Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. For the past century, animated feature films have enthralled and enhanced audiences worldwide, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed not to care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults and believed that there aren't animated films for adults only to enjoy. Their warped belief is made very clear by the film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations) and the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Only liberal-biased film critics praised the film upon its release, while general audiences were repulsed by it.
+
|As the first R-rated American animated film to be released by a major film studio in the United States following 1999's ''South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut'', ''Sausage Party'' blatantly criticizes religion and deceives audiences into thinking that, without religion and the existence of God, everyone can enjoy the most selfish, crude, and debauched activities (e.g., humanism, homosexuality, obscenity, and non-stop sexual intercourse) without guilt or a sense of a "religious obligation". Made by Nitrogen Studios. A typical offensive and raunchy comedy film by modern Hollywood standards, directors Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan, producer Megan Ellison, producer/writer Evan Goldberg, and producer/writer/actor Seth Rogen (all of them fiercely liberal and some, ironically, of Jewish origin) made this film to bastardize the animation genre, as well as to push the liberal Hollywood agenda on politics and religion. For the past century, animated feature films have enthralled and entertained audiences worldwide, as the best ones tell timely stories that children, teenagers, and adults alike can relate to and enjoy. The makers of ''Sausage Party'' seemed not to care about any of this, as they made this untimely film strictly for adults and believed that there aren't animated films for adults only to enjoy. The film's criticism and parody of many other animated films (namely Disney animations), along with the presence of regular Disney collaborator Alan Menken as the film's songwriter, make this warped belief clear. Altogether, ''Sausage Party'' is painfully unfunny and has virtually no plot or philosophical merit. Only liberal-biased film critics praised the film upon its release, while general audiences were repulsed by it.
   −
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted much criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and were forced by the directors to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.<ref>http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/</ref> The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story "made his day".  
+
On a side note, ''Sausage Party'' has attracted much criticism on two additional issues. First, the animators worked under poor, cruel conditions and the directors forced them to work overtime without pay. Thirty-six of the 83 animators were blacklisted and went uncredited in the film, believed to be due to their complaints; comments made in anonymous interviews of some of the animators involved in the project by ''Variety'', ''The Washington Post'', and ''The Hollywood Reporter'' alleged that the comments were accurate. All the animators in the film were told outright that they would be blacklisted if they did not work overtime without pay. Second, a red-band trailer for the film was accidentally played before a showing of the Walt Disney Pictures/Pixar Animation Studios' PG-rated and family-oriented ''Finding Dory'', at a Concord, California multiplex in mid-June 2016.<ref>http://ew.com/article/2016/06/29/theater-plays-sausage-party-trailer-before-finding-dory-apologizes/</ref> The theater staff had forgotten to switch out an adult-audience trailer roll for one meant for G and PG-rated films, when adding additional screens to carry ''Finding Dory'' to meet audience demand. The incident occurred only once, and the theater apologized, while Rogen [[Twitter|tweeted]] that the story "made his day".  
 
|$89,645,124
 
|$89,645,124
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,049: Line 2,049:  
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes the redistribution of wealth.
 
|Japanese anime film is about a tiny homeless family that steals from regular people. Demonizes capitalism and promotes the redistribution of wealth.
 
|$19,202,743
 
|$19,202,743
 +
|-
 +
|''Spermageddon'' (Norway)
 +
|2024
 +
|R
 +
|This horrifyingly adult animated film glorifies unsafe sexual practices, with two rebellious underage teenagers engaging in graphic sex and promoting teenage pregnancy. The scenes with John's visible erection are not only distracting, but also very disturbing since he's still a teenager at 16 years old. Yes, the age of consent in Norway is 16, but it's still unpleasant to see.
 +
|$1.4 million
 
|-
 
|-
 
|''Strange World''
 
|''Strange World''
Line 2,059: Line 2,065:  
|2012
 
|2012
 
|N/A
 
|N/A
−
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have "their fair share" and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a "disgusting hit piece".<ref>https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102</ref><ref>http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html</ref> The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded "Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you", with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannety and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannety Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles at a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should "p*** on [the producer]."<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M</ref>
+
|An animated film written by [[Fred Glass]], narrated by [[Ed Asner]], and made for the California Federation of Teachers. It repeated rhetoric made by the [[Occupy Wall Street]] group about taxing the rich to have "their fair share" and demonized Capitalism in various ways, including blaming it on Asian sweatshops as well as the housing bubble bursting in 2008. [[Kirsten Powers]], a member of [[The Daily Beast]], and herself no stranger to liberal politics, acknowledged alongside conservative economist for ''The Daily Caller'' Tucker Carson on the Sean Hannity show that the cartoon was simply inexcusable and disgusting, with Sean Hannity also explicitly referring to it as a "disgusting hit piece".<ref>https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/sean-hannity-slams-ed-asner-398102</ref><ref>http://reagancoalition.com/articles/2012/20121206006-ca-union-class.html</ref> The film was particularly infamous for a scene where, in a segment covering the trickle-down effect, a corpulent rich man representing the 1% of wealthy Americans, after having the scales literally stacked up in his favor regarding money, upon being asked why the 1% needed so much money, he responded "Don't worry, this is good for you too, it will trickle down from us to you", with the latter statement being accompanied with a graphic of the rich man proceeding to urinate on the other ordinary people as they yell in protest. Although later versions freeze the footage just before the man pees on the crowd in response to the complaints about the scene, it was still implied by residual audio of the urine stream. Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin of the Sean Hannity Show both expressed disgust with the video when covering it, and when one of the producers confronted Ed Asner as the latter was about to attend one of his roles in a play, the latter falsely claimed he didn't remember what he said on it, and also claimed that the bit about rich people peeing on poor people was disgusting only because it should have been in reverse, and then asked the producer if he had any money, and if so, if he should "p*** on [the producer]."<ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr1ZzsAzq_M</ref>
 
|N/A
 
|N/A
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,065: Line 2,071:  
|2023
 
|2023
 
|PG
 
|PG
−
|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classicly a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descents, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed that character; the first was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.
+
|A 3D animated reboot film of the TMNT/Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles franchise produced by infamously [[woke]], mediocre, narcissistic, and toxic actor [[Seth Rogen]], showing the iconic, popular, and alluring character April O'Neil, who is classically a Caucasian redheaded young woman of Irish-Scottish descent, as a cringey and deliberately blackwashed and obese teenager, another victim of modern liberal [[Hollywood]]'s anti-redhead/ginger racism and hatred and also its obesity promotion and propaganda with the misleading and deceitful term "body positivity". This is also the second time [[Nickelodeon]] blackwashed that character; the first was in the short-lived TV series ''Rise of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles''.
−
|-
  −
|''Onward''
  −
|2020
  −
|PG
  −
|This movie glorified much of the [[homosexual agenda]] and normalized gay relationships. Specter, a cyclops cop for the city of New Mushroomton, is a lesbian who has an unnamed "girlfriend" and has an unnamed "daughter". The movie was banned in Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Iran and Saudi Arabia because of this. On January 27, 2020, two months before the film was released, a San Francisco tattoo artist named Sweet Cecily Daniher had filed a copyright lawsuit against Disney, Pixar and Onward producer Kori Rae, believing that Pixar had copied the design of her Vanicorn in violation of her rental agreement with the company, as well as the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act and the California Artists Protection Act. She has sought in her suit to prohibit the distribution of the film and any infringing advertisements or merchandise. It was a huge box office failure due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
  −
|$141.9 million
   
|-
 
|-
 
|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')
 
|''Tentacolino'' (AKA ''In Search of the Titanic'')
 
|2004
 
|2004
 
|Not Rated
 
|Not Rated
−
|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' stars the first movie's characters trying to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]] only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film portrays being held prisoner positively, for the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever. Don Juan willingly submits to being taken prisoner and coerces his companions to do the same. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic and those who died on that night by referring to the Titanic as "mythical." Family values are even set aside when the main characters are more concerned with seeing Atlantis again than with their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.
+
|The notorious sequel to ''The Legend of the Titanic'' follows the first movie's characters as they try to find the sunken [[RMS Titanic]], only to be taken to the mythical city of Atlantis. This North Korean film portrays imprisonment positively, as the king of Atlantis forces the main characters to stay in Atlantis forever. Don Juan willingly submits to being taken prisoner and coerces his companions to do the same. It also shows disrespect towards the tragedy of the Titanic and those who died on that night by referring to the Titanic as "mythical." Family values are even set aside when the main characters care more about seeing Atlantis again than about their families back home. A sequel TV series was released in 2011 with the same bad values and strange nature.
 
|€4,000,000
 
|€4,000,000
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,082: Line 2,082:  
|1994
 
|1994
 
|G
 
|G
−
|Considered by many to be Don Bluth's worst film, the movie stars a troll named Stanley, who is exiled from the Land of Trolls for his love of growing flowers. He ends up in Central Park, where he meets two children. He also ends up a little ''too'' happy when a little girl kisses him on the cheek. The movie's end has an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never make about their recent flops.
+
| Many consider this Don Bluth's worst film; it stars a troll named Stanley, who is exiled from the Land of Trolls for loving to grow flowers. He ends up in Central Park, where he meets two children. He also becomes a little too happy when a little girl kisses him on the cheek. The movie ends with an environmental message when Stanley causes plants to grow all over the city, potentially causing trouble for people in New York City. Even Don Bluth admitted this was the worst movie he had created, a statement many directors in the 2020s would never make about their recent flops.
 
|$71,368
 
|$71,368
 
|-
 
|-
Line 2,088: Line 2,088:  
|2022
 
|2022
 
|PG (should be PG-13)
 
|PG (should be PG-13)
−
|The film encourages rebellion against parents and is full of suggestive humor and unsuitable themes for children. One of the most blatant themes of this film is a metaphor for menstruation, in which the women in Mei-Li's family turn into giant red pandas. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, "My panda, my choice," a slogan used by pro-abortionists.
+
|The film encourages rebellion against parents and includes suggestive humor and themes unsuitable for children. One of the film's most blatant themes is a metaphor for menstruation, in which the women in Mei-Li's family turn into giant red pandas when they become emotional. The movie even ends with Mei-Li blatantly telling her mother, "My panda, my choice," a slogan used by pro-abortionists.
 
|$13.4 million
 
|$13.4 million
 
|-
 
|-
SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
541

edits

Navigation menu