141
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − ==Move to Your User Page== − Hi. My name is Mark Reid. I am a relatively new user at Conservapedia but hoping for great things from the project. I am a New York lawyer in good standing, which I suppose makes me a pariah almost from the outset, and an administrative law judge as well (in the welfare department, no less). I am also a Catholic, educated in parochial schools (my high school was the same as Rudy Giuliani's, Bishop Loughlin MHS in Brooklyn, though Rudy and I have never met as he is much older). I hope to submit useful articles, particularly on 1920s history and one or two other areas of personal interest. TO ALL SYSOPS: If I cross you or the rules, please let me know first (before acting). I'm usually reasonable, no matter what my wife says. − − {{User Clintonlied}} − {{User American}} − {{User Evo}} − {{User USConstitution}} + +
no edit summary
{{Welcome}} Your introduction normally goes on your user page and not user talk. This page is reserved for comments like the following:
{{Welcome}} Your introduction normally goes on your user page and not user talk. This page is reserved for comments like the following:
==Warren G. Harding==
==Warren G. Harding==
Why did you remove this large part of the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Warren_G._Harding&curid=8387&diff=221683&oldid=221679&rcid=237442 Warren G. Harding] article? Normally you should discuss such serious changes in the article's talk page, and I see not edits from you. Without such an explanation, you stand a likely chance of getting blocked as a vandal and having all your work rolled back. Please explain yourself. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 03:19, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
Why did you remove this large part of the [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Warren_G._Harding&curid=8387&diff=221683&oldid=221679&rcid=237442 Warren G. Harding] article? Normally you should discuss such serious changes in the article's talk page, and I see not edits from you. Without such an explanation, you stand a likely chance of getting blocked as a vandal and having all your work rolled back. Please explain yourself. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 03:19, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
Well, I meant no harm. If there is a formal process of submitting edits to a committee for review and approval, I don't know about it, and would be glad to see those rules if you could point me in the right direction. My changes were based on scholarly research of an accredited researcher backed by my own fact checking (which was not to the level of thoroughness I would probably like but I am an amateur here, as I assume we all were). Is there any actual objection to the substance of what I wrote, or is this only about process? [[User:Leffingwell|Leffingwell]] 16:52, 8 July 2007 (EDT)