Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
need to pick judges
Line 4: Line 4:     
'''Contestants in our team contest: go to your confidential namespace ([[Team1:Players]] or [[Team2:Players]]) and help identify who you would like to fill the remaining two spots on your teams.'''
 
'''Contestants in our team contest: go to your confidential namespace ([[Team1:Players]] or [[Team2:Players]]) and help identify who you would like to fill the remaining two spots on your teams.'''
 +
 +
 +
== Need to pick judges ==
 +
 +
We need to pick about 3 or 5 judges to award the points.  Let's pick from Sysops who are not on a team.  Both sides should agree on the judges.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 19:37, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
== Rules ==
 +
    
Two captains will be chosen from among our top users, and they will take turns adding members to their team, until they have seven team members beside themselves.  They will invite users to join their team, and if the user accepts, they become part of that team.  Records of the team members will be kept at [[Conservapedia:Team contest/Team one]] and [[Conservapedia:Team contest/Team two]].
 
Two captains will be chosen from among our top users, and they will take turns adding members to their team, until they have seven team members beside themselves.  They will invite users to join their team, and if the user accepts, they become part of that team.  Records of the team members will be kept at [[Conservapedia:Team contest/Team one]] and [[Conservapedia:Team contest/Team two]].
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,194

edits

Navigation menu