Block, SkipCaptcha, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
5,655
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Team contest (view source)
Revision as of 02:37, July 9, 2007
, 02:37, July 9, 2007no edit summary
::: The judges will evaluate quality, not me.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:26, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
::: The judges will evaluate quality, not me.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:26, 2 July 2007 (EDT)
== Scoring system ==
I suggest that the points awarded to a new entry be decreased from 6 to 5, and the points awarded to a quality edit of an existing entry be increased from 4 to 5. It seems to me they should be rewarded equally, as they are equally valuable.
Also, a quality contribution to the front page is worth more than 2 points (and takes longer also). How about 3 or 4 points for that? Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:56, 8 July 2007 (EDT)
:Your suggestions are excellent. ~ <font color="Turquoise">[[User:SharonS|Sharon]]<sup>[[User talk:SharonS|Talk]]</sup></font> 22:37, 8 July 2007 (EDT)