nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − And what a disaster that was.+ + + + +
Talk:United States presidential election, 2000 (view source)
Revision as of 06:27, July 9, 2007
, 06:27, July 9, 2007no edit summary
You've been reverted on that same information before Walter. Your concluding sentence alone calls for a revert:
<blockquote>The United States Supreme Court prevented all votes from being recounted, thus insuring Bush's victory in Florida.</blockquote>
That is completely false. The Supreme Court was never asked to consider all votes being recounted as Al Gore chose a different path. The other information you included was also considered controversial at the time it was reported. Others looked at the same ballots and came to different conclusions. There were far more issues including disqualifying military votes, people voting who are not registered (common in Democratic precincts), over votes, the networks calling the state for Gore when the state was still voting, and possible confusion over ballot make up. In the end it comes down to the same thing, it's speculation and isn't part of the story of the steps that Gore took or the decisions that were made in regard to the election. I hope this helps. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 02:27, 9 July 2007 (EDT)