Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Team contest (view source)
Revision as of 10:44, July 9, 2007
, 10:44, July 9, 2007Judges' pages
::: Better you, would like to organize a public school team to take on the winner of this contest??? Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
::: Better you, would like to organize a public school team to take on the winner of this contest??? Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:43, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
== Judges' pages ==
Andy, should't the judges have their own confidential page?
Also: the judges will need access at least to a roster of each team in order to tally points or to evaluate each team's point claims.
Last of all: I propose that the team gets its two points for a block, ''so long as the judges determine that any reasonable and prudent non-competitor would have acted similarly.'' Anyone can have a block reversed, but still have good and sufficient cause to apply the block at the time. But I wouldn't want to encourage even the appearance of someone blocking without cause merely to earn points.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 06:44, 9 July 2007 (EDT)