Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
no edit summary
:(Oops, I just found out that leaving the edit summary blank is ''not'' discreet! I have to put ''something'' in it, or else the software copies the beginning of whatever I post!! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:(Oops, I just found out that leaving the edit summary blank is ''not'' discreet! I have to put ''something'' in it, or else the software copies the beginning of whatever I post!! --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:55, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
Right. However, your point was well taken. Was the database actually locked? I see no evidence of a vandal attack or that edits were actually blocked.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:57, 9 July 2007 (EDT)