13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
Debate:Is it okay for Conservapedia to have biased articles? (view source)
Revision as of 17:38, July 9, 2007
, 17:38, July 9, 2007→NO
It is completely unacceptble for any source to twist facts horribly as is done here and then present them to impressionable school children as fact. This is one of the most morally unsound programs I have ever encountered and I intend to continue posting this opinion on debate topics in an attempt to expose how evil this site truly is.
It is completely unacceptble for any source to twist facts horribly as is done here and then present them to impressionable school children as fact. This is one of the most morally unsound programs I have ever encountered and I intend to continue posting this opinion on debate topics in an attempt to expose how evil this site truly is.
Helios-Fear no God, fear only that which can be seen or heard, for no God will lay hands upon one who denies them. Here in lies the weakness of faith.
Helios-Fear no God, fear only that which can be seen or heard, for no God will lay hands upon one who denies them. Here in lies the weakness of faith.
Hmmm. well it does say "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" impliying that its articles are truthful and unbiased but it also says right on the front page "A '''Bold text'''Consevertive ---- encyclopedia you can trust. The truth shall set you free." between these 2 there are more moral attitude shifts then presidental lies in this addminastration alone
==Yes==
==Yes==