Changes

The point being that some "new entries" might be very minimal, while others might be much better, but still not enough to qualify for "Quality new entry".  I believe that the judges should have the discretion to allot points anywhere between 6 and 10 depending on the quality.

The point being that some "new entries" might be very minimal, while others might be much better, but still not enough to qualify for "Quality new entry".  I believe that the judges should have the discretion to allot points anywhere between 6 and 10 depending on the quality.

If we don't do this, it raises another problem.  If a competitor creates a new entry that is more than just a very minimal one, do they list it as a "new entry" or a "quality new entry".  If they list it as the latter, and the judges deem it to not be so, what happens then?  I guess they can reallocate it to "new entry", but if they are going to be deciding which it is, then there's little point in us competitors trying to decide which it is (quality or otherwise).

If we don't do this, it raises another (minor) problem.  If a competitor creates a new entry that is more than just a very minimal one, do they list it as a "new entry" or a "quality new entry".  If they list it as the latter, and the judges deem it to not be so, what happens then?  I guess they can reallocate it to "new entry", but if they are going to be deciding which it is, then there's little point in us competitors trying to decide which it is (quality or otherwise).

[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:01, 9 July 2007 (EDT)

[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:01, 9 July 2007 (EDT)