Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + + + + + + +
→Rules
*A "quality edit" to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.
*A "quality edit" to an existing article includes at least two extra sentences, an additional reference, and the inclusion of an important or relevant fact.
Feel free to revise as you see fit, this shouldn't be all that hard. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:33, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
Feel free to revise as you see fit, this shouldn't be all that hard. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 17:33, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:Hoji, I like your criteria. But to this I would like to add:
:# One point of extra credit for having more than, say, six relevant citations.
:# One point of extra credit for enclosing the citations in ref tags and including the references tag to define a reference section.
:# Two points of extra credit for submitting an article well-organized into sections.
:# One point of extra credit for breaking an existing article into logical sections if it didn't already have any.
:# A new article should be eligible for ''all'' forms of credit that can attach to an article--thus, submitting a quality new page ''with categorization'' should rate eleven points--ten for the article and one for the cat tag.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 23:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)