1,792
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 221:
Line 221: + +
→To "Sir" or not to "Sir": What has Fox News got to do with anything?
If Fox News sees fit to accord these figures (both historical and contemporary) their full title, I see no reason why Conservapedia should be so churlish as to deny Newton his. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] 16:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
If Fox News sees fit to accord these figures (both historical and contemporary) their full title, I see no reason why Conservapedia should be so churlish as to deny Newton his. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] 16:13, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:Thanks for that. I wasn't being critical of your earlier list, so much as RSchlafly's (invalid) use of it to make his point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:45, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:Thanks for that. I wasn't being critical of your earlier list, so much as RSchlafly's (invalid) use of it to make his point. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:45, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
: What has Fox News got to do with anything? I thought that Fox News was owned by some Australian! He could be some friend of Philip's for all I know, and have the British queen's image on his money. [[User:RSchlafly|RSchlafly]] 01:21, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==
==Changed Leibniz calculus dispute statement==