1,307
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 110:
Line 110: + + + + + +
→On my talk page
: What ''is'' factual about what was posted [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 22:19, 7 March 2007 (EST)
: What ''is'' factual about what was posted [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 22:19, 7 March 2007 (EST)
==Democratic Party+
At least please do some serious work yourself on the Democratic Party entry. This site is so embarrassingly uneducated. Why not produce something you can be proud of?
At least please do some serious work yourself on the Democratic Party entry. This site is so embarrassingly uneducated. Why not produce something you can be proud of?
:While the article could use some work - articles always need work; they are never perfect - it did not need the "work" you suggested. As for this site, it is not uneducated nor embarrassing. In fact, I am positive that this project will look great on my college transcript. I am very proud of this site. I did not think it would turn out as great as it has. As for contributing any more material to the article, I am afraid I can't - need to be up early for my SATs tomorrow! --[[User:David R|<<-David R->>]] 21:29, 9 March 2007 (EST)
P.S. Sign your posts please. It makes it so much easier to respond.
Please also explain your objections to my edits on the Democratic Party entry. What constituted "vandalism" in my edits?
Please also explain your objections to my edits on the Democratic Party entry. What constituted "vandalism" in my edits?
Thanks in advance for your explanation.
Thanks in advance for your explanation.