Siteadmin, Check users, Administrators
12,071
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: + + + + + +
Needed: rulings and publication
:# A new article should be eligible for ''all'' forms of credit that can attach to an article--thus, submitting a quality new page ''with categorization'' should rate eleven points--ten for the article and one for the cat tag.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 23:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:# A new article should be eligible for ''all'' forms of credit that can attach to an article--thus, submitting a quality new page ''with categorization'' should rate eleven points--ten for the article and one for the cat tag.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 23:02, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
:Good Idea [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 03:00, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
:Good Idea [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 03:00, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
== Needed: rulings and publication ==
Gentlemen, we need to rule on a question of blocking credit: If someone unblocks and then ''re''blocks a user account, then shall that person's team get the two points for applying the block? If so, then shall we require a decent interval to pass between the unblock and the reblock? I suggest twenty-four hours.
Also: we've come up with some suggestions that we all seem to agree are excellent. These qualify as rulings, and I move that we publish them to the [[Conservapedia:Team contest|contest]] page right away so that both teams know exactly how we're going to score their articles, edits, and blocks.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 07:24, 10 July 2007 (EDT)