Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 474: Line 474:     
: Your link is not to the Wikipedia entry on "abortion", which is what most people will access.  Also, please sign your comments by clicking the signature button above.  Thanks and welcome!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:42, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 
: Your link is not to the Wikipedia entry on "abortion", which is what most people will access.  Also, please sign your comments by clicking the signature button above.  Thanks and welcome!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:42, 9 March 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
: Fine. Here is the link to the section on breast cancer in the abortion article: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion#Breast_cancer], which contains a link to the aforementioned article. And I did sign my comment; there was an edit conflict and I had to retype it all out and I forgot to resign it. [[User:GofG|GofG]] 21:52, 9 March 2007 (EST)
    
==Wikipedia six times more liberal than public?==
 
==Wikipedia six times more liberal than public?==
    
Someone needs to check their math on this one. If twice as many people identify themselves as conservative as liberal, then 1/3 of the public identifies themselves as liberal. If 3 times as many Wikipedia editors identify themselves as liberal instead of conservative, then 3/4 of Wikipedia editors identify themselves as liberal. 3/4 divided by 1/3 is 9/4, or 2.25. Therefore, "six times" is just incorrect math, and 2.25 times is the correct answer.
 
Someone needs to check their math on this one. If twice as many people identify themselves as conservative as liberal, then 1/3 of the public identifies themselves as liberal. If 3 times as many Wikipedia editors identify themselves as liberal instead of conservative, then 3/4 of Wikipedia editors identify themselves as liberal. 3/4 divided by 1/3 is 9/4, or 2.25. Therefore, "six times" is just incorrect math, and 2.25 times is the correct answer.
254

edits

Navigation menu