Changes

: Two more points to be made.  First off, the feeling of "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia" up to this suggestion seem to be things that could be rectified.  This one is doubtful if it could be rectified if it is indeed an issue.  Secondly, if it was the case that this is a valid criticism, then a likewise valid criticism of conservapedia is that it was founded by a Christian conservative.  This is not to say that either Christian conservative or objectivist is a bad thing, but if one is a valid criticism, then the other is likely too.  As this is not part of the criticisms section of wikipedia (for good reason) to include it here would reduce any moral high ground that is had.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:49, 9 March 2007 (EST)

: Two more points to be made.  First off, the feeling of "Examples of Bias in Wikipedia" up to this suggestion seem to be things that could be rectified.  This one is doubtful if it could be rectified if it is indeed an issue.  Secondly, if it was the case that this is a valid criticism, then a likewise valid criticism of conservapedia is that it was founded by a Christian conservative.  This is not to say that either Christian conservative or objectivist is a bad thing, but if one is a valid criticism, then the other is likely too.  As this is not part of the criticisms section of wikipedia (for good reason) to include it here would reduce any moral high ground that is had.  --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 21:49, 9 March 2007 (EST)

::JoshuaZ, Jimbo and the Arbitration Committee decide when to discipline Admins.  Who decides who's on the Arbitration Committee?  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:54, 9 March 2007 (EST)conservative

::JoshuaZ, Jimbo and the Arbitration Committee decide when to discipline Admins.  Who decides who is on the Arbitration Committee?  [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:54, 9 March 2007 (EST)conservative

== Abortion and breast cancer ==

== Abortion and breast cancer ==