254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 486:
Line 486: + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:12, March 10, 2007
, 03:12, March 10, 2007→Abortion and breast cancer
:: Andrew, it is linked in the article right where you would expect it to be, under the summary section dealing with ABC. I'd also be curious as to what you mean by "organizations that do not conduct any research and have obvious liberal biases" [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:10, 9 March 2007 (EST)
:: Andrew, it is linked in the article right where you would expect it to be, under the summary section dealing with ABC. I'd also be curious as to what you mean by "organizations that do not conduct any research and have obvious liberal biases" [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 22:10, 9 March 2007 (EST)
::: Whether or not it's biased is not the question. The article says that wikipedia "omits" it. They do not omit it, they just have a biased article about it. There is a difference. Why not put:
::::"Wikipedia denies that the results of 16 out of 17 statistically significant studies is notable."
:::Or something like that that exposes the bias but does not lie. [[User:GofG|GofG]] 22:12, 9 March 2007 (EST)
==Wikipedia six times more liberal than public?==
==Wikipedia six times more liberal than public?==