4,542
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: − − == Needed: rulings and publication == − − Gentlemen, we need to rule on a question of blocking credit: If someone unblocks and then ''re''blocks a user account, then shall that person's team get the two points for applying the block? If so, then shall we require a decent interval to pass between the unblock and the reblock? I suggest twenty-four hours. − − Also: we've come up with some suggestions that we all seem to agree are excellent. These qualify as rulings, and I move that we publish them to the [[Conservapedia:Team contest|contest]] page right away so that both teams know exactly how we're going to score their articles, edits, and blocks.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 07:24, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − :Support 24 hour rule[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 16:59, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − ''When a user unblocks and reblocks an account, credit may only be granted if not less than 24 hours has passed between the two events.'' − :Codified, move to publish [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 17:10, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − :Someone codify everything else and archive the discussions. [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 17:10, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − − == Team 1 Substitution == − − From the chatter that I watch continually, I now learn that [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] wants to quit Team 1, and that [[User:DeborahB.|DeborahB.]] wants to join the team. − − [[User:Aschlafly|Andrew]] has assented to this, even though, as he says, the substitution "will make Team 1 even harder to beat." The brutal fact is that Conservative was little more than dead weight. As of 9:30 a.m. EDT today, he had contributed ''nothing'' to the effort of that team--I was trying to run my own tally at the time. And as of right now, he has done only the most minor edit to an article that he had already created: [[Hamilton Square Baptist Church riot]]. − − I'm ready to consider the substitution effective immediately, and retroactive to the start of the contest. And I further move that we all look at Conservative's contributions to that article beyond 12:01 am EDT July 10 to see whether they merit the two points that a small edit normally earns.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 14:43, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − :Second motion [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 16:57, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − ==Conservative== − ''On the issue of Hamilton Square edits made by Conservative, how do you vote?'' − :'''Grant''' The edits appear to merit two points. [[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Geo.]]<small>[[User_talk:Geo.plrd|Complain!]]</small> 17:13, 10 July 2007 (EDT) − :'''Grant''' two points. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:36, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
Archiving
::I like your ideas, Terry. Shall we forward these proposals to Andy, or do we not need his approval? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:25, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
::I like your ideas, Terry. Shall we forward these proposals to Andy, or do we not need his approval? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 12:25, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
:::We're the judges, and Andy has in fact joined one of the teams. Therefore, what we say--or rather, how we rule--goes.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:33, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
:::We're the judges, and Andy has in fact joined one of the teams. Therefore, what we say--or rather, how we rule--goes.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 12:33, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
==Points==
==Points==
As judges, are we required to make a record of every single edit made by all of the users over the course of this week? I thought that was what private record pages for each individual were for. As judges, our responsibility is more concerned with issues like Conservative's edits, and resolving disputes, correct? I think it is time to start enforcing the private record sheets, and make sure that every contestant is keeping track of their own edits. Is this view of our responsibilities accurate? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:35, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
As judges, are we required to make a record of every single edit made by all of the users over the course of this week? I thought that was what private record pages for each individual were for. As judges, our responsibility is more concerned with issues like Conservative's edits, and resolving disputes, correct? I think it is time to start enforcing the private record sheets, and make sure that every contestant is keeping track of their own edits. Is this view of our responsibilities accurate? --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Ĥøĵĭmåçħôńğ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 20:35, 10 July 2007 (EDT)