1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 148:
Line 148: + + + + +
Liberal Bias
--[[User:DogChapman|DogChapman]] 02:04, 4 July 2007 (EDT)DogChapman
--[[User:DogChapman|DogChapman]] 02:04, 4 July 2007 (EDT)DogChapman
:Prove that it doesn't, and you've got a case. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:12, 4 July 2007 (EDT)
:Prove that it doesn't, and you've got a case. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] 02:12, 4 July 2007 (EDT)
== Liberal Bias ==
After a very extensive study, I have concluded that the Bible, in particular the New Testament, is tainted by an insidious liberal bias. The teachings of Christ make absolutely NO mention of the values we hold dear. Jesus foolishly exhorted his would-be followers to give up their devotion to money and material goods. This bleeding heart "son of god" intervened in the lawful stoning of a woman (or "whore") caught in adultery. Not one single time does he allude to the horrific scouge of homosexuality. To take the teachings of Jesus literally is to practice tolerance of-- and even love for-- gays, blacks, Jews, and other inferior racial and religious groups. This, in time, could lead to a society free of racial and sectarian hatred and violence, and then, my friends, where would we be? Who would pay us the slightest bit of attention if we lost the ability to frighten the poorly-educated masses with the threats posed by non-white, non-Christian, non-heterosexual degenerates who would destroy our children's minds with science, art and literature?
It is time to attack this corruption at the source. I propose removing the four so-called "Gospels" from future printings of our Holy Scriptures, and replacing them with more stuff about burning and killing and smashing people's heads open and stuff-- especially blacks and Muslims and fags. If anyone just totally insists on keeping Jesus in there, we should focus on how he got the crap beat out of him, like in that cool Mel Gibson flick. (Where's the video game for that one???)