Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33: + + + + + + + +
→Activity?: Don't fall for this liberal trick!!
::"sexual activity" could include kissing etc, but probably doesn't include sitting on the other side of the classroom ''watching'' the girl of his dreams/boy of her dreams. I'm on the "orientation" side of the orientation/activity fence. --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 10:22, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
::"sexual activity" could include kissing etc, but probably doesn't include sitting on the other side of the classroom ''watching'' the girl of his dreams/boy of her dreams. I'm on the "orientation" side of the orientation/activity fence. --[[User:Scott|Scott]] 10:22, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
:::Don't be lured into this debate. It's a typical tactic of homosexuality advocates to quibble about such definitions. What they want to imply is that it's okay to "be homosexual" ''even in terms of Christian values'' as long as they don't violate church rules on behavior.
:::Jesus covered that with his "look of lust" rule in Matthew 5:27-28 which says:
*27 “You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’
*28 But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
:::When I have time, I'll explain more about why [[homosexuality]] is a sin - both as a desire ([[sinful desire]] and as an act ([[sinful act]]). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:37, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
==Heterosexuality is not "the" natural sexual attration - it is a natural sexual orientation==
==Heterosexuality is not "the" natural sexual attration - it is a natural sexual orientation==