60
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 583:
Line 583: + +
Talk:Science of global warming (view source)
Revision as of 23:24, July 11, 2007
, 23:24, July 11, 2007no edit summary
:Readers of the politics article will be interested in who's on what side, but the scientifically-minded just want to know the facts - and whether there are any theories which can explain those facts. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
:Readers of the politics article will be interested in who's on what side, but the scientifically-minded just want to know the facts - and whether there are any theories which can explain those facts. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 14:28, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
So... Still no comment on your "false claims on consensus" addition to the article, and to the "study" you base it on, alltho i have now asked atleast 3 times. I allso provided you with the study by Oreskes, which you don't from reasons unspecified accept as proof of consensus or the statements from all the national academyes of science etc. But you keep avoiding these and i don't really have any hope left that i get a decent answer or can get the article to reprisent facts even remotely. This is just as futile as debating with most of the creationists, too strong ideological views to be changed by any facts, you just look the other way. So ill just admit my defeat and leave this site alone. But i thank you from the debate, atleast you where willing to discus the subject, and not to block critisism right away for example under the 90/10 rule. And im sure you are convinced, that im just as blinded by my liberal ideology than i think you are, but seams we just have to continue disagreeing there ;) [[User:HeikkiL|HeikkiL]] 19:24, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
== Solar variation and global warming ==
== Solar variation and global warming ==