Changes

Personally, I believe that journalistic sources are good and necessary to have as they are often primary sources of information rather than an abstraction later.  This keeps Conservapedia a secondary source of information rather than a third or fourth level source.  But if difference #6 is to be maintained, then a critical look at those two articles and future articles that depend upon journalistic sources needs to be made. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 13:44, 11 July 2007 (EDT)

Personally, I believe that journalistic sources are good and necessary to have as they are often primary sources of information rather than an abstraction later.  This keeps Conservapedia a secondary source of information rather than a third or fourth level source.  But if difference #6 is to be maintained, then a critical look at those two articles and future articles that depend upon journalistic sources needs to be made. --[[User:Mtur|Mtur]] 13:44, 11 July 2007 (EDT)