5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: − A slight delay due to computer difficulties unfortunately, but I simply wished to outline the reasons behind the changes I made. +
→Viewpoints
== Viewpoints ==
== Viewpoints ==
I simply wished to outline the reasons behind the changes I made.
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.
Essentially, Intelligent Design, as is, can not be a scientific theory unless you can prove the existence of God with the scientific method. You can believe it, you could be right, but it is not science. This is the reason why the petition to have it taught in the science classroom was denied.