Changes

==No==

==No==

We are going for quantity not quality. Although out first [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandment]] says ''Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from Wikipedia<ref>It is appropriate to quote or cite Wikipedia to illustrate the liberal view of an issue.</ref> or elsewhere unless it was your original work.'' But recently we have decided that ''cut and paste in haste'' from .gov sources is fine<ref>"We paid for work on government websites. It's ours already. It's not just public domain, but it is also bought and paid for by the public. So it's fine to copy unbiased material from such sites."[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=216373&oldid=216298].</ref> if you add a reference after what you copied. Do not copy from out of copyright versions of Encyclopedia Britannica because Wikipedia did that early on in order to up its article count. That's [[liberal]] [[deceit]] we don't do deceit. Remember we [[Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia|encourage conciseness here]] so don't copy more than a few sentences. We usually just copy what most people know already so we don't overburden them with [[ignorance|too much knowledge]]. Remember don't add a ''stub template'' like at Wikipedia because that implicitly encourages long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fact&direction=next&oldid=45426 facts].

We are going for quantity not quality. Although out first [[Conservapedia:Commandments|commandment]] says ''Everything you post must be true and verifiable. Do not copy from Wikipedia<ref>It is appropriate to quote or cite Wikipedia to illustrate the liberal view of an issue.</ref> or elsewhere unless it was your original work.'' But recently we have decided that ''cut and paste in haste'' from .gov sources is fine<ref>"We paid for work on government websites. It's ours already. It's not just public domain, but it is also bought and paid for by the public. So it's fine to copy unbiased material from such sites."[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Main_Page&diff=216373&oldid=216298].</ref> if you add a reference after what you copied. Do not copy from out of copyright versions of Encyclopedia Britannica because Wikipedia did that early on in order to up its article count. That's [[liberal]] [[deceit]] we don't do deceit<ref>"If we have to, use Britannica as a guide (and only a guide...no copying!) to structure and flow of thought." [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Team1:Players&diff=prev&oldid=221982]</ref>. Remember we [[Conservapedia:How_Conservapedia_Differs_from_Wikipedia|encourage conciseness here]] so don't copy more than a few sentences. We usually just copy what most people know already so we don't overburden them with [[ignorance|too much knowledge]]. Remember don't add a ''stub template'' like at Wikipedia because that implicitly encourages long-winded, verbose entries, making it difficult to recognize the essential [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Fact&direction=next&oldid=45426 facts].

<references/>

<references/>