20
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6:
Line 6: + +
Talk:National Health Service (view source)
Revision as of 19:21, July 12, 2007
, 19:21, July 12, 2007no edit summary
Well, it might not be a bad idea actually. Just because it's communist (or at least a curious hybrid of unbridled capitalism, corruption and state control) doesn't mean that we should ignore it.
Well, it might not be a bad idea actually. Just because it's communist (or at least a curious hybrid of unbridled capitalism, corruption and state control) doesn't mean that we should ignore it.
:Exactly, are these people trying to create an encyclopaedia about the real world, or the one they want to live in? Wait, it seems Aschlafly [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Chinese_Army&action=history created] the [Chinese Army] article! Was he trolling or was what he said just badly worded? I'm confused. Anyway, unless someone wants to make an article on this Honor thing, it would make much more sense to move the National Health Service article back here, adding a line at the top about its other meaning. [[User:EmanresU|EmanresU]] 15:21, 12 July 2007 (EDT)