Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 152: Line 152:  
:::::::::The last time I looked, you weren't one of the official judges. Please confirm your identity via ASchlafly, or I will consider your account to have been hacked. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::::The last time I looked, you weren't one of the official judges. Please confirm your identity via ASchlafly, or I will consider your account to have been hacked. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 18:34, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::Just my final comment since this is quickly becoming sheer name-calling (Vicious fascists? Come on...) and because we both have more important things to do (I'd guess): It's VERY difficult to directly compare CP and WP in their first years. The entire landscape changed. WP was effectively the first of its kind to actually take off slowly. See also the sudden boost in editors once CP became more well-known. As such, making "They did it, so there" statements is a bit off. Especially when this site adds a "but we still criticize them for doing it" to it. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:03, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:::::::Just my final comment since this is quickly becoming sheer name-calling (Vicious fascists? Come on...) and because we both have more important things to do (I'd guess): It's VERY difficult to directly compare CP and WP in their first years. The entire landscape changed. WP was effectively the first of its kind to actually take off slowly. See also the sudden boost in editors once CP became more well-known. As such, making "They did it, so there" statements is a bit off. Especially when this site adds a "but we still criticize them for doing it" to it. --[[User:Sid 3050|Sid 3050]] 18:03, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Um. Can we get back to the problems instead of cattiness? [[Ace (baseball)]] is still contentless, unexpandable, and ''page protected''. Wikipedia did it to make stubs that could grow into full articles. That's okay, I guess, but if I wanted to merge [[ace (baseball)]] somewhere, I couldn't, because it's protected.
 +
 +
This content isn't just promoting the creation of junk; it's promoting a possessive attitude towards junk. "This is my junk, and you can't touch it or you're sabotaging my efforts in the contest!" is the implicit message when a one-sentence stub gets page protected. [[User:AManInBlack|AManInBlack]] 18:36, 12 July 2007 (EDT)
263

edits

Navigation menu