Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:     
That is all entirely true. Britain has not declined in any political or social aspect. I suspect what the person who wrote that news piece means is that Britain has declined morally, with their acceptance of evolution and all. That is opinion, and somehow not very befitting an website which fancies itself as an encyclopedia. [[User:Argonaut|Argonaut]] 18:35, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
 
That is all entirely true. Britain has not declined in any political or social aspect. I suspect what the person who wrote that news piece means is that Britain has declined morally, with their acceptance of evolution and all. That is opinion, and somehow not very befitting an website which fancies itself as an encyclopedia. [[User:Argonaut|Argonaut]] 18:35, 30 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
With the exception of the idiotic observation about the 'acceptance of evolution' above, I agree.  The notion that Britain has 'declined' suggests a monstrous presupposition, that Britain was once great.  Britain became great in 1948 with the introduction of the National Health Service, the Nationalisation of the Railways the Coal Mines and the major industries all of which took the working people of Great Britain forward into a world immensely richer and freer than that of their forefathers.  This work by the Attlee govn was a major, practical step towards socialism, and should be being celebrated and analysed in a positibve wat, not knocked in sly, leading questions by stupid, right- wing pretend-encyclopedias such as this.
 +
 +
chris larner
    
==Yes==
 
==Yes==
 +
 +
You'll notice that there are no entries in the "yes" section
12

edits

Navigation menu