109
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + + + + + +
Talk:The Lord of the Rings (view source)
Revision as of 09:54, March 10, 2007
, 09:54, March 10, 2007→How I got Houghton Mifflin to fix the dustjacket
*Personaly I think its better than Lord of the Rings by far.--[[User:James G.|James G.]] 19:03, 15 February 2007 (EST)
*Personaly I think its better than Lord of the Rings by far.--[[User:James G.|James G.]] 19:03, 15 February 2007 (EST)
==What About The Bible??==
Why does this article not mention the absolute prohibtion against magic in the Bible? This book, along with Harry Potter, just lures kids in to thinking magic is fun and can be used for good without realizing that its use is an abomination to God, punishable by death. Not that I expect anyone will pick up this book and start casting spells, but it's the first step towards accepting magic as not inherently evil.
Before anyone chimes in, I recognize that Tolkien was a Christian (well...Catholic), but he was still evidently not one who was very concerned with saving his readers' souls or bringing the good news to those around him. He preferred to keep his head buried in the occult and in false pagan mythology...not exactly a role model for a conservative.
--[[User:JesusSaves|JesusSaves]] 04:54, 10 March 2007 (EST)