12
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: +
Sorry-I'll keep debate here from now on.
This is not an article about gynaecology or oncology. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 21:31, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
This is not an article about gynaecology or oncology. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 21:31, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, I'm not helping by spreading my debate all over the site - I just wrote a response to you on your Talk page [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Fox&curid=26454&diff=236895&oldid=236867].
It's not an article ABOUT oncology, but oncology - and the desire to avoid dealing with it - is the raison d'etre for the breast exam, and since this article deals with risk factors, what's the harm of a sentence on an important aspect? [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
It's not an article ABOUT oncology, but oncology - and the desire to avoid dealing with it - is the raison d'etre for the breast exam, and since this article deals with risk factors, what's the harm of a sentence on an important aspect? [[User:PFoster|PFoster]] 21:33, 16 July 2007 (EDT)