Changes

: Look at this way:  How many more conservatives would we need on Wikipedia such its balance reflected the American public?  Wikipedia is 3:1 liberal, so we need six times as many conservatives.  Six is correct.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:23, 10 March 2007 (EST)

: Look at this way:  How many more conservatives would we need on Wikipedia such its balance reflected the American public?  Wikipedia is 3:1 liberal, so we need six times as many conservatives.  Six is correct.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:23, 10 March 2007 (EST)

:: Then what you should be saying is that Wikipedia is six times less conservative, not six times more liberal. As you pointed out yesterday, there is a major difference. Plus, if you're going to make extraordinary claims, you need to back them up with actual numbers. If you do the appropriate substitutions into the equation above, you'll find that C1/C2 = 1.573/(1-M2). For this to be equal to 6 would require that M2=0.73, i.e., about 3/4ths of Wikipedians would have to be moderates.

:: Then what you should be saying is that Wikipedia is six times less conservative, not six times more liberal. As you pointed out yesterday, there is a major difference. Plus, if you're going to make extraordinary claims, you need to back them up with actual numbers, not a hand-waving argument. If you do the appropriate substitutions into the equation above, you'll find that C1/C2 = 1.573/(1-M2). For this to be equal to 6 would require that M2=0.73, i.e., about 3/4ths of Wikipedians would have to be moderates.--[[User:Manchot|Manchot]] 22:21, 10 March 2007 (EST)