nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 331:
Line 331: + + + + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 03:36, July 17, 2007
, 03:36, July 17, 2007→Take a step back: An example
:And while I'm on the subject, I'll thank you not to make any more of your complex claims. You see us as flawed? By what standard? As far as I'm concerned, your flaw is our standard of excellence.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
:And while I'm on the subject, I'll thank you not to make any more of your complex claims. You see us as flawed? By what standard? As far as I'm concerned, your flaw is our standard of excellence.--[[User:TerryH|TerryH]]<sup>[[User talk:TerryH|Talk]]</sup> 22:00, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
Very well put, TerryH. I might add that many Wikipedia defenders will hide behind "vandalism" to explain its [[liberal]] bias. But the 50+ examples of bias are not vandalism.
Wikipedia is a smear factory, a high-tech lynch mob. In addition to destroying people with smears and lies, Wikipedia is feeding pornography to children. Wikipedia boosts its traffic for its for-profit search engine by promoting gossip and obscenity. It is worse than the National Enquirer. No thanks, I don't want anything to do with it now.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:49, 16 July 2007 (EDT)
:Adding my own two bob's worth, when Wikipedia's {{wp|Intelligent_design}} article was proposed for Featured Article status (or something like that), I opposed on the grounds of the bias in the article. Not only was my opposition rejected, as I expected, but there were threats to delete my comments as being trolling! Yet ''many'' people over the previous months had complained of bias in the article, and they were always slapped down, and in some cases banned. I even had another Wikipedian, a scientist, e-mail me and say that he disagreed with pretty well everything I stood for (regarding religion, evolution, etc.), yet he agreed with me that the article was biased, but that he had given up trying to fight the bloc of anti-ID people protecting the article. That's just one example of several that I could quote. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:36, 16 July 2007 (EDT)