277
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 48:
Line 48: + + +
Debate:If it could be unambiguously demonstrated that man is NOT the most evolved animal, then would this support or refute ther idea of Creation by God? (view source)
Revision as of 15:14, July 17, 2007
, 15:14, July 17, 2007no edit summary
Or maybe God became a Buddhist."Karma Five!!" [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 22:20, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
Or maybe God became a Buddhist."Karma Five!!" [[User:Prof0705|Prof0705]] 22:20, 5 May 2007 (EDT)
==Infantile Fantasy==
Those who use the acronym "IF". Because it hasn't been unambiguously demonstrated. That's why there is a science fiction section in book stores and libraries. The research appears to... had assumed... if this is correct... are all ambiguous terms. That would be an unscientific basis for any hypothesis. Unless you live in "IF" land. In which this is merely another religious debate and not a scientific one since it involves GOD.--[[User:Roopilots6|Roopilots6]] 11:14, 17 July 2007 (EDT)