32
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 48:
Line 69: − + − + − + Line 59:
Line 80: − + Line 77:
Line 98: − +
Debate:Atheism vs. Pastafarianism (view source)
Revision as of 03:59, July 18, 2007
, 03:59, July 18, 2007→Why Atheism is ridiculous
:Your argument has one fundamental flaw--you are assuming that God is everything which is something that is absouletly true. [[User:Lopku|Lopku]] 8:50, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
:Your argument has one fundamental flaw--you are assuming that God is everything which is something that is absouletly true. [[User:Lopku|Lopku]] 8:50, 11 July 2007 (EDT)
:I've complied your argument and run it. It has nothing to do with God. Here's your argument:
#define GOD everything
int main(){
:everything exists by definition of thing;
:therefore, GOD exists;
:return 1;
}
Here it is after preprocessing:
int main(){
:everything exists by definition of thing;
:therefore, everything exists;
:return 1;
}
Where do you mention the omni-present flying fairy in the sky?
[[User:Cthx]]
* I've never spoken with, seen or heard any spagetti fly which was not first thrown, that's why I don't go off claiming I know what the Flying Spagett's Monster's will is.
* I've never spoken with, seen or heard any spagetti fly which was not first thrown, that's why I don't go off claiming I know what the Flying Spagett's Monster's will is.
* I am an American citizen and know that 96% of the world population wishes they were Americans too. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:07, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
* I am an American citizen and know that 96% of the world population wishes they were Americans too. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:07, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
Atheism isnt ridiculous god awnsers pryers in three ways yes no and wait.
Atheism isn't ridiculous god answers prayers in three ways yes no and wait.
If you were praying to god to win the lottery you would either win, lose but consider gods awnser to be wait.
If you were praying to god to win the lottery you would either win, lose but consider gods answer to be wait.
In the win senario you acredit god for the win and if you lose god is telling you to wait he'll get to you.
In the win scenario you credit god for the win and if you lose god is telling you to wait he'll get to you.
If you pray to a cellphone to win the lottery you will either win or lose but assume that the awnser is wait.
If you pray to a cellphone to win the lottery you will either win or lose but assume that the awnser is wait.
What I'm getting at is that if you pray to god or a cellphone you will get the same resoult any win even with god or the cellphone on your side is just a coincdence. P.S: Its not a debate if their is only one point of view.[[ME]]
What I'm getting at is that if you pray to god or a cellphone you will get the same resoult any win even with god or the cellphone on your side is just a coincdence. P.S: Its not a debate if their is only one point of view.[[ME]]
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
::I'm not sure I'll ever understand your obsession with spaghetti, but at some point it stops driving your point and starts making you look really devoid of ideas. Your point is: God is as laughable and dubious an idea as the idea of a ''flying spaghetti monster''. In other words, you can't combat logic with logic, so you'll make Rosie O'Donnell-styled faces and wierd-noises to prove your point. Oh, I get it ... [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:54, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
::I'm not sure I'll ever understand your obsession with spaghetti, but at some point it stops driving your point and starts making you look really devoid of ideas. Your point is: God is as laughable and dubious an idea as the idea of a ''flying spaghetti monster''. In other words, you can't combat logic with logic, so you'll make Rosie O'Donnell-styled faces and weird-noises to prove your point. Oh, I get it ... [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 10:54, 29 April 2007 (EDT)
::I agree that it's pointless to argue about which religion is better with someone who does not acknowledge the existance of a deity. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 08:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
::I agree that it's pointless to argue about which religion is better with someone who does not acknowledge the existence of a deity. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 08:36, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
::If one starts out by stating that Atheism is ridiculous, just exactly who is supposed to take up the debate? Of course, believers view atheism as incorrect, just as adults view Santa as fiction. To whom is your discussion directed?--[[User:Eastfernstreet|Eastfernstreet]] 14:55, 26 May 2007 (EDT)
::If one starts out by stating that Atheism is ridiculous, just exactly who is supposed to take up the debate? Of course, believers view atheism as incorrect, just as adults view Santa as fiction. To whom is your discussion directed?--[[User:Eastfernstreet|Eastfernstreet]] 14:55, 26 May 2007 (EDT)