Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,795
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
Talk:Essay:Greatest Conservative Movies (view source)
Revision as of 01:20, July 20, 2007
, 01:20, July 20, 2007reply to Hoji
I'm just curious how $139m [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/business] can be considered "low-budget". --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]</font></sup> 15:41, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
I'm just curious how $139m [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0145487/business] can be considered "low-budget". --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''ηοξιμαχονγ''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|θαλκ]]</font></sup> 15:41, 18 July 2007 (EDT)
: $139M in production costs is pocket change these days, Hoji!
: I think Spider-Man is in the top 5, and maybe the top 2, in profitability. It's #7 in domestic revenue, having a much lower production cost than other top movies. Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 21:20, 19 July 2007 (EDT)
==FarenHYPE==
==FarenHYPE==