Changes

== AGAINST ==

== AGAINST ==

I have to say, I keep up with Conservapedia daily, mostly because I don't agree with the views of the website.  I do have to point out something.  Conservapedia constantly points out smears against conservatives and false articles on Wikipedia, but I haven't yet found a smear against Conservapedia itself.  Why not lay off the smearing of other sites when they aren't smearing you in the first place?

I have to say, I keep up with Conservapedia daily, mostly because I don't agree with the views of the website.  I do have to point out something.  Conservapedia constantly points out smears against conservatives and false articles on Wikipedia, but I haven't yet found a smear against Conservapedia itself.  Why not lay off the smearing of other sites when they aren't smearing you in the first place? From Steven, Digitamer81

Of course not, not yet. the entire goal is to eliminate bias, add facts, and eventually make it reliable. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)

Of course not, not yet. the entire goal is to eliminate bias, add facts, and eventually make it reliable. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font>^{<font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font>} 20:20, 7 May 2007 (EDT)