Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 80: Line 80:     
:: Your silly sarcasm aside, [[liberals]] do have a love for airing profanity, and in objecting even to its removal from general broadcast.  Spielberg seemed to enjoy inserting dirty words into unexpected places in children's movies, such as E.T.  Saving Private Ryan was filled with one four-letter-word after another.  Maybe you can explain that obsession better than I can.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:01, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 
:: Your silly sarcasm aside, [[liberals]] do have a love for airing profanity, and in objecting even to its removal from general broadcast.  Spielberg seemed to enjoy inserting dirty words into unexpected places in children's movies, such as E.T.  Saving Private Ryan was filled with one four-letter-word after another.  Maybe you can explain that obsession better than I can.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:01, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: In the case of SPR, I think he was using realistic language that soldiers use.  The same goes for the violence of the movie, he wasn't trying to pull any punches and shield the audience from the grotesque realities of a war zone.  I don't think that constitutes an obsession. I was actually shocked by the decision (I can't recall the network) to air it uncensored, and would hope that responsible parents would not allow their children to have watched it.  --[[User:Colest|Colest]] 17:18, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
1,148

edits

Navigation menu