Changes

::::::::: Hoji, I'm glad you liked the movies.  But there's nothing wrong with examining their message.  I love Haagen-Daz ice cream.  But I didn't object when someone told me that it is twice as fatty as Breyer's ice cream.  We welcome information about the content of the food we eat.  Why the resistance to analyzing the content of the films we view?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:29, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

::::::::: Hoji, I'm glad you liked the movies.  But there's nothing wrong with examining their message.  I love Haagen-Daz ice cream.  But I didn't object when someone told me that it is twice as fatty as Breyer's ice cream.  We welcome information about the content of the food we eat.  Why the resistance to analyzing the content of the films we view?--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:29, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

::::::::: Purely by coincidence, I just noticed an [[FCC]] decision discussing how "Saving Private Ryan is filled with expletives and material arguably unsuitable for some audiences."  20 FCC Rcd 4507.  That isn't why I objected to it, but I'm not surprised given the [[liberals]] who made the movie.  It's a bit like learning that alcohol consumption is harmful to more than just one's liver.  This is hardly a surprise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

::::::::: Purely by coincidence, I just noticed an [[FCC]] decision discussing how "Saving Private Ryan is filled with expletives and material arguably unsuitable for some audiences."  20 FCC Rcd 4507.  That isn't why I objected to it, but I'm not surprised given the [[liberals]] who made the movie.  It's a bit like learning that alcohol consumption is harmful to more than just one's liver.  This is hardly a surprise.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 16:26, 20 July 2007 (EDT)