1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 27:
Line 27: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Human reproduction/draft (view source)
Revision as of 02:14, July 21, 2007
, 02:14, July 21, 2007Username, JesusMySavior: Concerning the Article
There is also the seperate health issue, and that is the main priority. There will be kids worrying about being normal, explicit descriptions are required, including variance. We have a responsibility here, and it must not be something we shy away from. [[user:Stevendavy|stevendavy]]
There is also the seperate health issue, and that is the main priority. There will be kids worrying about being normal, explicit descriptions are required, including variance. We have a responsibility here, and it must not be something we shy away from. [[user:Stevendavy|stevendavy]]
== Username, JesusMySavior: Concerning the Article ==
I realize my opinions severely contradict the majority of those expressed, but, personally, I feel we must avoid subjecting youth, or, really, anyone of impressionable mind, for that matter, to graphic sexual content. We must refrain from using correct terminology when addressing the human...How might I put this? Tiddlebits (excuse me, it was all I could manage to think of). I do realize that, yes, we hold a responsiblity to informing those of curious mind regarding this subject matter, yet, we can do this in a way that is both educational and sexually subtle. I've actually created an index of updated terms, a "Conservadictionary," if you will.
Penis: Schmenis
Vagina: Schmagina