Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No change in size ,  23:23, July 21, 2007
m
fixed AGAIN. need to lay off the sauce
Line 5: Line 5:     
==From Burglary to Political Scandal==
 
==From Burglary to Political Scandal==
Evidence that emerged at the burglary trial suggested that the break-in had the approval of higher-level government officials who were attempting to cover up their involvement.  This possibility was aggressively pursued by investigative [[reporter|reporters]] in the print [[media]], with [[Washington Post]] reporters [[Carl Bernstein]] and [[Bob Woodward]] playing particularly critical roles.  Woodward and Bernstein, as well as others, discovered evidence that the break-in was only part of a wider effort of political "dirty tricks" designed to discredit Democratic candidates.  They also uncovered the existence of a secret [[slush fund]] used to finance these activities<rev>Bernstein, Carl and Woodward, Bob.  ''All The President's Men''</ref>.
+
Evidence that emerged at the burglary trial suggested that the break-in had the approval of higher-level government officials who were attempting to cover up their involvement.  This possibility was aggressively pursued by investigative [[reporter|reporters]] in the print [[media]], with [[Washington Post]] reporters [[Carl Bernstein]] and [[Bob Woodward]] playing particularly critical roles.  Woodward and Bernstein, as well as others, discovered evidence that the break-in was only part of a wider effort of political "dirty tricks" designed to discredit Democratic candidates.  They also uncovered the existence of a secret [[slush fund]] used to finance these activities<ref>Bernstein, Carl and Woodward, Bob.  ''All The President's Men''</ref>.
    
==Senate Investigation==
 
==Senate Investigation==
147

edits

Navigation menu