Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
14 bytes removed ,  21:59, July 22, 2007
m
no edit summary
Line 94: Line 94:  
   
 
   
 
===Hypocrisy===
 
===Hypocrisy===
−
Human Rights Watch has called on the [[United States]] to stop workplace discrimination on nationality and class inside the United States and other countries.  Critics claim that the organization does not even follow the standard they set. HRW hires nearly all of its employers from American and English nationalities, and its Committee members include only decisions makers from the upper class, none from the middle-income class. Nearly all of the organizations articles and reports are produced in English, HRW claims that they are not produced in more languages because of the cost of translation. The organization has asked for volunteers to translate reports and documents.  The organization has also been criticized as having a double standard in its dealing in the [[Middle East]].  President of the Zionist Organization of America, Morton Klein stated, "For Human Rights Watch to call on Israel and Jews not to live in Judea and Samaria is simply racist. Why is it that Arabs can live in Israel, and Arabs can live in the West Bank, and Jews cannot live in the West Bank?” <ref>NGO Monitor, 2005, http://www.ngo-monitor.org/archives/news/HRWLetter-NYSun.htm</ref>.
+
Human Rights Watch has called on the [[United States]] to stop workplace discrimination on nationality and class inside the United States and other countries.  Critics claim that the organization does not even follow the standard they set. HRW hires nearly all of its employers from American and English nationalities, and its Committee members include only decisions makers from the upper class, none from the middle-income class. Nearly all of the organizations articles and reports are produced in English, HRW claims that they are not produced in more languages because of the cost of translation. They have asked for volunteers to translate reports and documents.  The organization has also been criticized as having a double standard in its dealing in the [[Middle East]].  President of the Zionist Organization of America, Morton Klein, stated, "For Human Rights Watch to call on Israel and Jews not to live in Judea and Samaria is simply racist. Why is it that Arabs can live in Israel, and Arabs can live in the West Bank, and Jews cannot live in the West Bank?” <ref>NGO Monitor, 2005, http://www.ngo-monitor.org/archives/news/HRWLetter-NYSun.htm</ref>.
    
===Political Position===  
 
===Political Position===  
 
[[Image:HumanRightsWatch1.jpg‎ |thumb|200px|Members of Human Rights Watch with Speaker of the House, [[Nancy Pelosi]]]]
 
[[Image:HumanRightsWatch1.jpg‎ |thumb|200px|Members of Human Rights Watch with Speaker of the House, [[Nancy Pelosi]]]]
−
Evan though the organization claims that it is a “non-partisan” human rights group many of the views held by HRW reflect those of the left. They believe that abortion is the “first and foremost a human right<ref> Discover the Networks, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258</ref>  
+
Evan though HRW claims that it is a “non-partisan” human rights group, many of the views held by HRW reflect those of the left. They believe that [[abortion]] is the “first and foremost a human right<ref> Discover the Networks, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258</ref>  
−
." HRW also support gay marriage. The organization is an opponent "in all circumstances" of the death penalty, stating that the death penalty is "a form of punishment that is unique in its barbarity and finality<ref> Discover the Networks, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258</ref>  
+
." HRW also support gay marriage. The organization is an opponent "in all circumstances" of the [[death penalty]], stating that the death penalty is "a form of punishment that is unique in its barbarity and finality<ref> Discover the Networks, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6258</ref>  
 
."  Critics claim that the human rights organization has a liberal approach of blaming America first.
 
."  Critics claim that the human rights organization has a liberal approach of blaming America first.
  
6,061

edits

Navigation menu