Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:  
Of course, as an atheist, I think the most sensible explanation is simply that the majority of the Earth's landmass has been through political instability in the past 100 years, and in places with large natural resources the instability is likely to be maintained by competing claimants because any given stable situation would favour one of them, and thus the others will fight it.
 
Of course, as an atheist, I think the most sensible explanation is simply that the majority of the Earth's landmass has been through political instability in the past 100 years, and in places with large natural resources the instability is likely to be maintained by competing claimants because any given stable situation would favour one of them, and thus the others will fight it.
 
--[[User:Kingreaper|Kingreaper]] 13:20, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 
--[[User:Kingreaper|Kingreaper]] 13:20, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
Another easy debate question. Its to make the richer, Christianer, and therefore better countries (i.e., The USA), are motivated to straighten up the blaspheming Arab countries. --[[User:Cranky Joe|Cranky Joe]] 14:44, 23 July 2007 (EDT)
34

edits

Navigation menu