5,175
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 10:
Line 10: + + +
categorize
They argued that:
They argued that:
* very visible evolutionary psychologists, such as MIT's Pinker, do not acknowledge "the importance of interactions and of [[cultural evolution]]" but promote the idea of a genetically fixed [[human nature]]. Circumstances and experiences contribute to each individual's nature rather than all of us having a human nature that has been genetically fixed by our evolutionary history, they observed. [http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2003/january29/cultures-129.html]
* very visible evolutionary psychologists, such as MIT's Pinker, do not acknowledge "the importance of interactions and of [[cultural evolution]]" but promote the idea of a genetically fixed [[human nature]]. Circumstances and experiences contribute to each individual's nature rather than all of us having a human nature that has been genetically fixed by our evolutionary history, they observed. [http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2003/january29/cultures-129.html]
[[category:sociology]]
[[category:genetics]]