45
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 70:
Line 70: + + +
no edit summary
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/09/giuliani.firefighters.ap/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/09/giuliani.firefighters.ap/index.html
Is is fair to balance a formal complaint by a union of 280,000 firefighters with a single letter from a retired firefighter? There's more text discrediting the union (who were the real heroes of the day) than there is describing their claims. And why mention that Giuliani is trying to discredit them as partisan? It makes him look like he's playing politics with their lives.
*User Aschlafly has posted that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information here, nor is it acceptable to cite it for work here. The complaints of a very few Firemen, as to if the Recovery effort was ended too soon, isn't a valid criticism, as it was predictable that there would always be some percentage that would think as they do, even if the Recovery effort lasted two years. PLEASE SIGN YOUR POSTS! --~ [[User:TK|Terry]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 21:25, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
*User Aschlafly has posted that Wikipedia is not an acceptable source of information here, nor is it acceptable to cite it for work here. The complaints of a very few Firemen, as to if the Recovery effort was ended too soon, isn't a valid criticism, as it was predictable that there would always be some percentage that would think as they do, even if the Recovery effort lasted two years. PLEASE SIGN YOUR POSTS! --~ [[User:TK|Terry]] <sup>[[User_talk:TK|Talk2Me!]]</sup> 21:25, 19 March 2007 (EDT)