Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
sanctimonious nonsense
Line 1: Line 1:  
Does the first sentence in the article refer to a '''public''' library? One would assume it does otherwise there would not be a controversy.[[User_talk:U2| U2]] 21:59, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Does the first sentence in the article refer to a '''public''' library? One would assume it does otherwise there would not be a controversy.[[User_talk:U2| U2]] 21:59, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
==The Constitutional issue==
 +
 +
A frequent argument given by those who want to discriminate ''against'' religion, is that to fail to do so is the same as [[establishment]] of religion.
 +
 +
This, of course, is nonsense, and they know it.
 +
 +
The military has long employed chaplains, but no one has ever complained that this ''establishes'' any particular religion - or even that it enforces belief in God (atheists and agnostics are free to stay away from religous services, just as believers who are backsliding or are simply lazy that day!). --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 22:02, 24 July 2007 (EDT)
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu